Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Yews Hill / North Rise

Goodpublished 18 May 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2017

Rated Good; inspectors found individual, kind and well-managed care, with a minor medicines labelling issue.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 13 September 2017. Inspectors reviewed care plans, medicines, staff records and quality checks. They observed care and spoke with people, relatives and staff.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People received support suited to their needs and were supported to make choices about their lives.

The service remained Good since the last inspection. The Effective rating improved from Requires Improvement because inspectors found that the required actions had been completed.

Medicines records were complete and medicines were stored safely. However, some creams were not labelled when opened, so inspectors said they might have been used after their use-by date.

What inspectors praised
  • Individual support

    Support was tailored to people's needs and risks were considered. People were involved in their care plans and reviews.

    “People received support which was individual to their needs, and risks were minimised wherever possible.” from the report
  • Respect and dignity

    Staff knew people well and treated them respectfully. They knocked before entering bedrooms and respected people's wishes not to be disturbed.

    “We observed staff were respectful when talking with people and they knocked on people's bedroom doors before entering.” from the report
  • Staff preparation

    Staff received induction, training, supervision and appraisal. New staff completed the Care Certificate.

    “Staff received a full induction consisting of taught classroom based sessions and shadowing within the service before starting as part of the planned rota.” from the report
  • Choice and independence

    People could decide how and where to spend their time. The home supported outings, holidays, shopping and contact with relatives.

    “People were supported in promoting their independence and community involvement.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Creams were not always labelled

    needs fixing

    Some creams were not labelled when opened. This created a risk that they could be used after their use-by date, so ask how this is now checked.

    “Some creams were not labelled on opening, which meant these could have been used after their use by date.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you make sure all creams are labelled with their opening date and checked before use?
  2. 02How often are each person's care plans and risk assessments reviewed, and how are changes shared with staff?
  3. 03How do you make sure staffing is sufficient when people want support inside and outside the home?
  4. 04What activities and community opportunities would be available for my relative?
  5. 05How can relatives give feedback, and what do you do when few survey responses are received?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five rating areas, including care, medicines, staffing, records and quality monitoring. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 October 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Yews Hill / North Rise

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. October 2017Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Yews Hill / North Rise →

  2. August 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Kirklees

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 86 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
See live-in carers near KirkleesProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.