Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Wordsley House

Goodpublished 24 April 2020, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home managed infection risks, including PPE, testing, vaccination checks, cleaning, visiting and admissions. The home also told inspectors it had measures to reduce the risks from COVID-19-related staffing pressures.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Wordsley House was inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection prevention, testing, vaccination checks and PPE.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 27 January 2022. It followed information that some non-exempt staff had not been vaccinated against COVID-19.

Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control, vaccination checks, and whether staffing pressures linked to COVID-19 were affecting the home. They were assured that the home was using PPE safely, arranging testing, managing visitors and admissions safely, and keeping its infection control policy up to date.

The home had extra cleaning, regular testing and enough PPE. People and relatives were supported to keep in contact using technology, and visits were supported safely.

The inspection was not rated. This means it does not give an overall quality rating or a full rating for the five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    The home had systems to reduce the spread of infection. Inspectors were assured that its infection prevention and control policy was up to date.

    “Systems were in place to prevent people, staff and visitors from catching and spreading infections.” from the report
  • PPE and testing

    Staff used suitable PPE and the home had ample supplies. People and staff took part in regular testing.

    “People and staff participated in a regular testing programme.” from the report
  • Cleaning

    The home carried out extra cleaning, including regular cleaning of frequently touched surfaces.

    “Additional cleaning of all areas and frequent touch surfaces was being carried out regularly.” from the report
  • Safe contact and visiting

    People and relatives were supported to stay in contact through technology. Relatives and professionals could visit safely in line with government guidance.

    “People and their relatives were supported to keep in contact using a range of technology.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control arrangements are in place now?
  2. 02How does the home check vaccination status for staff and visiting professionals?
  3. 03How does the home manage staffing pressures linked to COVID-19?
  4. 04How are visitors supported to visit safely?
  5. 05Which areas of care were not covered by this inspection, and when were they last assessed?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, vaccination checks and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated and the report does not provide a full assessment of all five areas. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection-control practice, with some improvements needed for waste disposal and PPE storage.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 26 February 2021. It looked at infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic, rather than giving a full service rating.

Inspectors found good practice. Visitors were checked before entry, PPE and handwashing facilities were available, and staff had completed COVID-19 training. The home was clean, with regular cleaning of frequently touched surfaces.

Inspectors were assured about visitor safety, social distancing, admissions, testing, hygiene and outbreak arrangements. They said some further improvements were needed in waste disposal and PPE storage, and signposted the provider to guidance.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors were asked relevant questions and had their temperature checked before entering. PPE and handwashing facilities were available.

    “All visitors had to answer a range of relevant questions and undergo a temperature check before entry.” from the report
  • Staff training

    Staff had completed specific COVID-19 training, including how to use PPE correctly.

    “Staff had completed specific COVID-19 training, including the correct use of PPE.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    Inspectors found the home clean and hygienic. Cleaning schedules included more frequent cleaning of frequently touched surfaces.

    “Daily cleaning schedules were in place to ensure more frequent cleaning was completed including frequently touched surfaces.” from the report
  • Family contact

    Staff helped people use technology to stay in touch with family and friends.

    “Staff supported people to use technology to maintain contact with families and friends.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Waste and PPE storage

    minor

    Inspectors said further improvements were needed in how waste was disposed of and how PPE was stored. The provider was signposted to resources to develop its approach.

    “We found some further improvements could be made regarding waste disposal and the storage of PPE” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have you made to waste disposal since this inspection?
  2. 02How is PPE stored now, and how do you check that it is stored correctly?
  3. 03How often are people living at the home and staff tested currently?
  4. 04What checks are visitors asked to complete before entering the home?
  5. 05How will you help my relative keep in contact with family and friends?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic; the service was inspected but not rated and the other key questions were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 7 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wordsley House

3 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Wordsley House →

  2. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Wordsley House →

  3. April 2020Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. June 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

43 live-in carers within about an hour of Hartlepool

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £970 to £1,120 a week. 40 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“I found Alison to be kind , caring helpful concencious... Alison has a heart of gold”
Roy A., about Alison G.
“Petty introduced herself to Mum every time she was caring for her and responded very quickly to Mum if she was distressed in the night.”
Judith W., about Petty Tutsirai C.
See live-in carers near HartlepoolProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.