Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Woodthorpe Manor Nursing Home

Goodpublished 22 February 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about visiting, admissions, PPE, testing, hygiene, social distancing and infection outbreak arrangements. They said the infection control policy needed some work to reflect the home's specific arrangements.
Effective?
Good
This was not covered by the targeted infection prevention and control inspection.
Caring?
Good
This was not covered by the targeted infection prevention and control inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This was not covered by the targeted infection prevention and control inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This was not covered by the targeted infection prevention and control inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control arrangements, with some work needed to tailor the infection policy to the home.

The CQC visited the home on 26 March 2021. This was an announced, targeted inspection focused on infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found safe visiting arrangements, support for telephone and video calls, regular contact with the GP practice, thorough testing, appropriate use of PPE and social distancing, and up-to-date infection control training.

Inspectors were assured about the home's arrangements for preventing and managing infections. They noted that the infection control policy was up to date, but some work was needed to tailor it to the home's own arrangements. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe visiting

    The home had visiting arrangements designed to support social distancing and reduce infection risks.

    “Safe visiting arrangements had been implemented to ensure compliance with social distancing within a safe environment.” from the report
  • Keeping in touch

    Staff helped residents maintain contact with family and friends when visits were not possible.

    “If visitors could not attend the home, staff supported people to speak with family and friends via the telephone or video calls.” from the report
  • Testing and PPE

    The home had a testing process for residents and staff, and inspectors found that PPE and social distancing guidance were being followed.

    “The home had a thorough testing process for staff and people living there.” from the report
  • Staff training

    Inspectors found that staff training covering infection control was up to date.

    “Staff training in all aspects of infection control was up to date.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Policy needed tailoring

    minor

    Although the infection prevention and control policy was up to date, it had been produced by an external agency and needed to reflect the home's own arrangements more closely.

    “some work was required to customise this to reflect specific arrangements within the care home.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have you customised the infection prevention and control policy to reflect this home's specific arrangements?
  2. 02How are visits currently organised, and what happens if a family member cannot visit in person?
  3. 03How often are residents and staff tested, and how are the results acted on?
  4. 04What infection control training have staff completed and when was it last updated?
  5. 05What ratings or inspection findings cover effective, caring, responsive and well-led care, since this report did not assess those areas?

This was an announced, targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the service was inspected but not rated and the wider quality of care was not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2019

Woodthorpe Manor Nursing Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care across all five areas.

This was an unannounced planned inspection on 9 January 2019. Inspectors spoke with seven people living at the home, four relatives and staff. They observed care, checked four care records and reviewed staffing, medicines, accidents, complaints and quality checks.

The home was rated Good overall, with Good ratings for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines systems, clean surroundings and good access to healthcare. People were supported with food, activities, communication and their personal routines.

People and relatives described kind and respectful care. Care plans were personalised and included people's preferences, communication needs and end-of-life wishes. The rating remained Good from the previous inspection, published on 2 July 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Experienced staff

    The staff team had substantial experience, helping them understand people's needs. Inspectors found enough trained staff on duty.

    “Fifty per-cent of the staff had worked at the service for 15 years or more.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans recorded people's preferred routines, interests and support needs. Inspectors found that staff followed these preferences.

    “People's preferred daily routines were set out in their care plans so staff knew how they liked their care and support delivered and when.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful support

    People had good relationships with staff. Staff protected privacy and dignity and encouraged people to do as much as possible for themselves.

    “Staff supported people in a way that made them feel they mattered.” from the report
  • Good oversight

    The manager used audits and feedback to check safety, care quality and the condition of the home. The report says improvements were made when things went wrong.

    “The home had a comprehensive audit system in place.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many staff are usually on duty for the current number and needs of residents?
  2. 02How do you review and update each person's care plan when their needs or preferences change?
  3. 03How are residents supported to take part in activities that match their interests, faith and communication needs?
  4. 04How do you make sure medicines are given at the right time and that staff remain competent to administer them?
  5. 05How are families involved in care reviews and decisions about end-of-life wishes?

This was an unannounced planned inspection covering all five CQC questions, including the premises and the care provided; the previous inspection was also rated Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 February 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Woodthorpe Manor Nursing Home

3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. April 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Woodthorpe Manor Nursing Home →

  2. February 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Woodthorpe Manor Nursing Home →

  3. July 2016Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

75 live-in carers within about an hour of Nottinghamshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 63 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Ernest is an amazing professional carer who delivers care from the heart.”
Melanie B., about Ernest C.
See live-in carers near NottinghamshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.