Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Wilton Lodge - Care Home

Goodpublished 9 July 2026, 3 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Wilton Lodge was inspected but not rated; inspectors found mostly suitable COVID-19 controls, but some PPE access and cleaning records needed improvement.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 3 February 2022. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements, and whether COVID-19 staffing pressures affected care.

Inspectors were assured about visiting, testing, admissions, shielding, social distancing, infection outbreak management and the infection control policy. Staff had received infection control training and COVID-19 vaccination was required for deployment.

There were two shortfalls. PPE was not always easy for staff to access, and not all cleaning of areas such as office equipment and high-touch points was recorded. The home said it was reviewing PPE locations and updating cleaning records.

The home was inspected but not rated. This inspection did not provide a full rating of the quality of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Visiting arrangements

    Visits were arranged in line with government guidance.

    “Visits were arranged in line with government guidance.” from the report
  • Regular testing

    People living in the home and staff were included in a regular testing programme.

    “People and staff were part of a regular testing programme.” from the report
  • Outbreak arrangements

    Inspectors were assured that infection outbreaks could be prevented or managed effectively.

    “We were assured the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • PPE access

    needs fixing

    PPE was not always easily accessible for staff. The registered manager said PPE station locations were being reviewed.

    “PPE was not always easily accessible for staff.” from the report
  • Cleaning records

    needs fixing

    Not all cleaning was recorded, including cleaning of office equipment and high-touch points. The home said it would add information to its documents.

    “Not all cleaning was recorded, for example office equipment and high touch points.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Where are PPE stations now located, and how do you make sure staff can access PPE easily?
  2. 02How do you now record cleaning of office equipment and high-touch points?
  3. 03What infection control training have staff completed, and when is it refreshed?
  4. 04How are residents and staff included in the regular testing programme?
  5. 05How do you manage visits and admissions when there is an infection risk?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and staffing pressures; it did not provide ratings for the other four questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2021

Wilton Lodge was inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured that infection control arrangements were safe during the coronavirus outbreak.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 17 December 2020. It focused on infection prevention and control because the home had a coronavirus outbreak.

Inspectors found good practice. Visitors had their temperatures taken and provided track and trace information. People who tested positive for COVID-19 were identified for barrier nursing, and staff worked on designated floors with designated residents.

Inspectors were assured that the home used personal protective equipment safely, followed shielding and social distancing rules, supported testing, and had arrangements to prevent or manage outbreaks. The home was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall Good or Requires Improvement rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor checks

    Visitors had their temperatures checked and provided the required track and trace information before entering.

    “Visitors temperatures were taken, and track and trace information required before entry.” from the report
  • Managing positive cases

    Residents who tested positive for COVID-19 were identified for barrier nursing.

    “Each COVID positive resident had a butterfly on their door identifying they were being barrier nursed.” from the report
  • Staff allocation

    Staff worked on designated floors and with designated residents, helping the home manage infection risks.

    “Staff worked on a designated floor of the home and with designated residents.” from the report
  • Infection control

    Inspectors were assured that the home used PPE safely, supported testing and had arrangements to prevent or manage outbreaks.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Further development identified

    minor

    Inspectors signposted the provider to resources to develop its approach. The report does not explain what specific changes were needed.

    “We have also signposted the provider to resources to develop their approach.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have you made since inspectors signposted you to resources to develop your infection prevention and control approach?
  2. 02How do you currently identify and care for residents who test positive for COVID-19 or another infection?
  3. 03How are staff allocated to floors and residents when there is an infection risk?
  4. 04What are your current visiting checks, including temperature checks and track and trace information?
  5. 05How do you arrange testing for residents and staff, and how do you manage an outbreak?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during a coronavirus outbreak; it was inspected but not rated and did not assess the other four questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 January 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wilton Lodge - Care Home

3 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Wilton Lodge - Care Home →

  2. January 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Wilton Lodge - Care Home →

  3. January 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. December 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 29 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

13 live-in carers within about an hour of Kingston upon Hull, City of

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,350 a week. 12 can care for a couple. 8 years' experience on average.

“What truly stands out is how mindful and attentive she is to all of my medical needs, always going above and beyond to ensure I’m comfortable and well cared for.”
Lucy K., about Emma H.
See live-in carers near Kingston upon Hull, City ofProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.