Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Wilton House

Goodpublished 21 January 2026, 8 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some staff training updates needed.

This was an unannounced inspection on 3 May 2018. One inspector spoke with one resident, one staff member and managers. They reviewed one care record, three staff files, training records, audits, complaints and other documents.

The home supported five people, although it was registered for six. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines support, suitable risk assessments and a clean environment. People were supported with food, health, personal choices and activities.

Inspectors found respectful relationships between staff and residents. Care plans described people's preferences and goals. The home had systems for complaints, staff support and quality checks.

All five areas were rated Good. This was the same overall rating as the previous inspection in February 2016. Inspectors found no serious risks or concerns from this inspection or their ongoing monitoring.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing

    Inspectors found that staffing levels matched residents' needs. Bank staff were recruited and inducted in the same way as permanent staff.

    “We saw that staffing levels matched the needs of the people who were using the service, and enabled people to receive the support they needed promptly.” from the report
  • Kind relationships

    Residents described staff as kind and respectful. Inspectors observed positive and respectful communication.

    “We observed staff interacting with people and saw that they were respectful, kind and positive in all their communication.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's preferences, important relationships and the support they wanted. The home also supported activities and progress towards independence.

    “These detailed the specifics of people's likes dislikes and preferences.” from the report
  • Good oversight

    Managers used audits, spot checks, meetings and feedback to monitor the home and make improvements.

    “Quality assurance systems were in place to help drive improvements.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some training needed updating

    minor

    Inspectors found that some staff training needed refreshing. Managers arranged this immediately, and the report says the refresher training had been completed after the inspection.

    “We saw that some areas of training required updating for some staff.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Which staff training needed refreshing, and how do you check that all training stays up to date?
  2. 02How will you assess and record my relative's needs before they move in?
  3. 03How do you make sure staffing levels and bank staff support are suitable for my relative each day?
  4. 04How would my relative be supported to choose activities and build independence?
  5. 05If my relative could not make a decision about care, how would you involve them, their family or an advocate?

This was an unannounced inspection of the overall service, but only one person was receiving regulated personal care at the time, and the report records evidence from one resident and one care record. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 June 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wilton House

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. June 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Wilton House →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of West Northamptonshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,280 a week. 87 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
Bridget S., about Nyarai N.
“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
See live-in carers near West NorthamptonshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.