Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Willow Park Care Home

Goodpublished 9 November 2022, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse, risks were assessed and enough staff were available. However, medicines records and checks were not always reliable, creating a risk that medicines might not be given consistently or when needed.
Effective?
Good
Staff had relevant training and worked with health and social care professionals. The manager was improving the dining experience after mixed feedback.
Caring?
Good
People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff sought consent, knew people's preferences and supported independence.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were mostly personalised and communication needs were recorded. People had a range of activities, including one-to-one activities for people cared for in bed.
Well-led?
Good
People, relatives and staff spoke positively about the new management team and its open approach. Quality systems were in place, but record keeping and newer checks still needed to be embedded.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2022

Willow Park Care Home was rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe care, but medicines records and quality checks needed improvement.

Inspectors visited without warning on 12, 13 and 18 October 2022. They spoke with 12 people, five relatives, 11 staff and two visiting professionals. They reviewed care plans, risk assessments, medicines records, staff files and quality records.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People and relatives spoke positively about the care, staff and manager. Inspectors found enough staff, suitable safeguarding arrangements, respectful care, personalised activities and good work with health and social care professionals.

Medicines were not always managed safely. Records did not always show why some medicines were given or whether they worked, and creams were not always clearly recorded. The home corrected some records during the inspection and put an action plan in place. Inspectors found no evidence that anyone had been harmed.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    People and relatives described staff as kind and caring. Inspectors saw staff respecting privacy, asking permission and supporting independence.

    “People were supported by staff who were caring and respected their dignity.” from the report
  • Staffing and safeguarding

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff were trained in safeguarding and knew what to do if they had concerns.

    “Sufficient numbers of staff were available to meet people's needs.” from the report
  • Person-centred activities

    Activities were varied and linked to people's interests and goals. People cared for in bed were also offered one-to-one activities.

    “We saw evidence of person-centred activities scheduled daily.” from the report
  • Open management

    The new management team was actively reviewing the service and encouraging feedback from people, relatives and staff.

    “The management team were new to the service and were working proactively and promptly to drive service improvement” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines records and checks

    serious

    Medicines were not always managed safely. Records did not always explain why 'when required' medicines were given or whether they were effective, and medicine discrepancies were not always investigated.

    “People's medicines were not always safely managed. We found no evidence people had been harmed.” from the report
  • Quality checks and record keeping

    needs fixing

    The home's audits did not identify all the issues found by inspectors. The provider was asked to continue embedding its quality checks and monitor whether records were complete.

    “We recommend the provider continues to embed the quality assurance process in place and monitor record compliance.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are 'when required' medicines recorded, including why they were given and whether they worked?
  2. 02How are medicine stock discrepancies investigated and escalated?
  3. 03What action has been completed to embed the new medicines quality checks?
  4. 04How are care records being reviewed during the move to electronic care planning?
  5. 05How is the new manager's application to become registered progressing?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five key questions and infection prevention and control; it was the first inspection of the service under the new provider, and the home was not providing nursing care to anyone at the time. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 November 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Willow Park Care Home

3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2022Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Willow Park Care Home →

  2. February 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  3. August 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. November 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 November 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

92 live-in carers within about an hour of Wakefield

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 79 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
See live-in carers near WakefieldProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.