Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Willow Court

Goodpublished 18 April 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from avoidable harm, risks were assessed, staffing levels met people's needs, and medicines were managed safely. Inspectors found medicine records were complete and stock balances matched the records checked.
Effective?
Good
People's needs were assessed before they moved in and care plans contained relevant information. Staff received training and support, people were supported with food and drink, and health professionals were involved when needed.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect. People and relatives were involved in care plan reviews and could choose how they wanted to be supported.
Responsive?
Outstanding
Care and activities were exceptionally personalised. People were supported to pursue interests, keep family contact, take part in community activities and receive sensitive end of life care.
Well-led?
Good
The home had an open, person-centred culture and a visible manager. There were quality checks, meetings and action plans to support ongoing improvements.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2019

Willow Court was rated Good overall, with Outstanding responsiveness and inspectors finding kind, safe and personalised care.

This was an unannounced planned inspection on 12 February 2019. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and checked care plans, medicine records, staff files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe, Effective, Caring and Well-led. Inspectors found people were protected from harm, medicines were managed safely, staff were trained, food and health needs were supported, and people were treated with kindness, dignity and respect.

Responsiveness was rated Outstanding. Inspectors found highly personalised support, including activities for people living with dementia, community links, cultural and faith events, help to maintain family contact, and sensitive end of life care. The overall Good rating means the home met the expected standards, with one area judged to be exceptional.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised support

    Staff worked hard to understand people's individual needs, preferences and life histories. People and relatives were involved in developing and reviewing care plans.

    “People and relatives told us they were fully involved in the development and review of their care plans.” from the report
  • Dementia care

    Inspectors found exceptional care for people living with dementia. Activities and the environment were adapted to people's needs and abilities.

    “People who lived with dementia received exceptional care. Activities and events were specifically tailored to their needs and abilities.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to follow their interests, overcome barriers and stay connected with family, schools and the wider community.

    “People were encouraged and supported to retain as much control over their lives as possible.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw warm and positive interactions. People were treated with dignity and their privacy was respected during personal care.

    “People were supported by kind and caring staff and were treated with dignity and respect.” from the report
  • Safe care

    Risk assessments, safeguarding training, staffing checks, infection control and medicine systems were all found to be effective.

    “Medicine administration records (MAR) were completed correctly, with regular audits in place.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you involve us and our relative in developing and reviewing their care plan?
  2. 02Which activities and outings would be suitable for our relative's interests, abilities and dementia needs?
  3. 03How will you record and follow our relative's end of life wishes if their needs change?
  4. 04How do you check medicines are given safely, and how do you learn from any medicine errors?
  5. 05How will you support our relative's cultural, spiritual and dietary needs?

This was an unannounced inspection of the care, accommodation and management of the home, covering all five CQC questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 April 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Willow Court

3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. April 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Willow Court →

  2. August 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 6 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Hertfordshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,300 a week. 82 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She handled the new situation in front of her with such professionalism and I felt I could trust her 100%.”
Siobhan D., about Sithabile Tabile M.
“She was v competent and confident and we felt our mum was safe in her care. She supported us through a difficult time.”
Lucy D., about Loritha C.
See live-in carers near HertfordshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.