Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Weston Favell Houses

Goodpublished 8 December 2025, 9 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2017

Weston Favell Houses is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care with strong rehabilitation support.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 29 and 30 August 2017. Inspectors spoke with three people living in the home and 11 staff. They reviewed care records, staff recruitment files, training information, staffing rotas, complaints records and quality checks.

The home supported up to five people with acquired brain injuries. Three people were living there at the inspection. Inspectors found enough trained staff, safe medicines systems and suitable safeguarding and recruitment arrangements. People's risks, care needs and choices were recorded and reviewed.

People were treated with kindness and respect. They were supported with food, healthcare, activities, family contact and rehabilitation aimed at greater independence. The home had an open culture, an approachable manager and systems to check and improve quality.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and risk support

    Inspectors found enough staff to provide planned activities, rehabilitation and timely support. Care plans helped people take positive risks while working towards independence.

    “There were sufficient numbers of staff available to meet people's needs in a timely way.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff knew people well and supported their choices, dignity and daily routines. People were treated compassionately and sensitively.

    “People developed positive relationships with staff and were treated with compassion and respect.” from the report
  • Personalised rehabilitation

    Care planning considered people's interests, beliefs and future goals. Activities were designed around both rehabilitation needs and leisure interests.

    “The activity schedule was based upon people's rehabilitation requirements and interests, and activities were combined to provide people with a therapeutic mix” from the report
  • Open leadership

    The report describes an open culture where people, relatives and staff could give feedback. Quality checks and audits were in place.

    “The service had a positive ethos and an open culture.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you assess and plan care for my relative before they move in?
  2. 02What rehabilitation activities would be available for my relative, and how would these link to their personal goals?
  3. 03How would you support my relative to take appropriate risks while staying safe and becoming more independent?
  4. 04What training and competency checks do staff have for medicines and acquired brain injury support?
  5. 05How would my relative and our family give feedback or raise a complaint, and how would you respond?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions; the report says the home was also rated Good at the previous inspection in July 2015. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 October 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Weston Favell Houses

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. October 2017Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Weston Favell Houses →

  2. August 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 May 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of West Northamptonshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,280 a week. 87 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
Bridget S., about Nyarai N.
“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
See live-in carers near West NorthamptonshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.