Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at West Ridings Care Home

Inadequatepublished 31 December 2025, 9 months ago

Rated Inadequate: inspectors found the home performing badly and the CQC has taken enforcement action.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind staff and prompt health support, but unsafe medicine arrangements and weak oversight led to breaches.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 5 July 2023. Inspectors first looked at Safe and Well-led because of concerns about nutrition, unexplained injuries and nursing care. They then expanded the inspection to Effective when they found issues during the visit.

The home had enough staff overall to keep people safe, and people described staff as kind and caring. Staff supported people to access healthcare and received training. However, medicines were not always stored or checked safely. Inspectors also found gaps in care records, DoLS records, staffing deployment, kitchen equipment checks and quality monitoring.

The home was rated Requires Improvement overall. Safe, Effective and Well-led were all rated Requires Improvement. Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this visit, so the report does not give new ratings for those questions. The previous overall rating was Good, published in December 2022.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and caring staff

    People and relatives gave a lot of positive feedback about staff. Staff were described as respectful, approachable and supportive.

    “The staff are very friendly and are approachable, kind and caring.” from the report
  • Prompt health support

    People said staff arranged healthcare when needed and with their consent. Records showed that different health professionals were involved in people's care.

    “People said staff were proactive in supporting their health needs and arranged any health care they needed promptly and with their consent.” from the report
  • Safeguarding systems

    Inspectors found an effective system for recognising, reporting and monitoring safeguarding concerns. People and relatives said they felt safe.

    “Records showed safeguarding allegations and incidents were appropriately identified, reported, recorded and monitored.” from the report
  • Staff training

    Staff had the training and support needed for their roles. New staff completed an induction that included the Care Certificate.

    “Staff received the training and support they required to meet people's needs.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine safety

    serious

    Some medicines were not securely stored. Refrigerator temperatures were not accurately monitored, creams were in unlocked cupboards, and a controlled drug recording error had not been noticed.

    “A medicine trolley in use in the lounge where people were present could not be locked.” from the report
  • Weak quality checks

    serious

    The provider's systems had not reliably identified or managed risks affecting people's health and welfare. This was a breach of good governance requirements.

    “The provider had not ensured systems and processes operated effectively to monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health and welfare of people” from the report
  • Staff deployment

    needs fixing

    Feedback about staffing was mixed. Inspectors saw people left unsupported in communal lounges at times, and staff said they could feel under pressure.

    “Staff told us there were times they felt under pressure to be in more than one place at a time.” from the report
  • Food and records

    needs fixing

    Some people said meals were often cold and there were not enough fresh vegetables. Food and fluid records also needed more detail to show whether people reached their targets.

    “We also saw meals were not covered when taken to people who had their meals in their rooms.” from the report
  • DoLS records

    needs fixing

    It was not always clear from people's records whether the required legal authorisations were in place. The manager had started a register to improve this.

    “It was not always clear in people's individual records if appropriate legal authorisations were in place, where needed, to deprive a person of their liberty.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has been done to make sure the medicine trolley, medicine creams, refrigerators and controlled drugs are now stored and checked safely?
  2. 02How are you checking that staffing levels and staff deployment are enough at busy times, including when people need two staff?
  3. 03How do you now make sure care plans, food and fluid charts and DoLS records are complete and up to date?
  4. 04What changes have been made to the food service, including meals arriving hot and offering more fresh vegetables?
  5. 05Can you show us the action plan responding to the Regulation 12 and Regulation 17 breaches, and explain what has been completed?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, expanded to include Effective; Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this visit and the report says ratings for uninspected questions carry over from the last inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2022

West Ridings Care Home is rated Good; inspectors found safe, personalised care and effective leadership, with improvements since the last inspection.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 7 December 2022. One inspector spoke with six people, reviewed 10 care records, checked staff recruitment and training records, and spoke with managers and seven staff.

Inspectors rated the home Good overall, and rated Safe, Responsive and Well-led as Good. They found enough staff, safe medicines systems, suitable risk assessments, clean premises and appropriate infection control. People were supported with personalised care, activities, communication and end of life planning.

The previous rating was Requires Improvement, with a breach of Regulation 17 about governance. Inspectors found that improvements had been made and the home was no longer in breach.

What inspectors praised
  • Staffing and safety

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff responded promptly to requests and had safeguarding training.

    “There were enough staff to meet people's needs.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans included people's life histories, preferences and communication needs. People and relatives were involved in reviews.

    “People's care and support was centred around their individual preferences and how they wanted to spend their time.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were offered a range of activities, including activities for people living with dementia. Inspectors saw people engaged and enjoying them.

    “There were a range of activities on offer to meet the needs of people living with dementia.” from the report
  • Improved leadership

    The home had improved its governance since the previous inspection. Managers used audits, meetings and feedback to monitor care and make improvements.

    “Enough improvement had been made at this inspection and the provider was no longer in breach of regulation 17.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some as-required medicine guidance

    minor

    Some protocols for medicines given when needed required extra information about when a dose might be needed. Staff could explain how the medicines were used, but this is worth checking for your relative.

    “When people were prescribed medicines 'when required' there were protocols in place, some of these required additional information to guide staff when doses might be needed.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you make sure guidance for medicines given when needed is complete and specific to each person?
  2. 02How often are staffing levels reviewed, especially when people's needs change?
  3. 03How are care plans and communication preferences updated with the person and their relatives?
  4. 04What quality checks have continued since the previous breach of Regulation 17 was resolved?
  5. 05How are people and relatives asked for feedback, and what changes have been made as a result?

This inspection considered Safe, Responsive and Well-led; Effective and Caring were not given separate ratings in the report. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 December 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of West Ridings Care Home

7 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  1. September 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at West Ridings Care Home →

  2. December 2022Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at West Ridings Care Home →

  3. July 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2021Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2021Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2019Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2019Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2017

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 30 November 2017.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

92 live-in carers within about an hour of Wakefield

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 79 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
See live-in carers near WakefieldProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.