Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Ward Green Lodge

Goodpublished 27 November 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People said they felt safe, and inspectors found enough staff, safe medicine procedures, suitable risk assessments and effective infection control. Some recruitment files lacked a written health declaration.
Effective?
Good
Staff had relevant training, supervision and appraisals. People received support with healthcare, food and drink, consent and decision-making.
Caring?
Good
Inspectors saw kind, patient and respectful care. Staff protected people's privacy and dignity, asked for consent and knew people well.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were personalised and regularly reviewed. People had choices about their daily lives and access to activities, community links and end of life support.
Well-led?
Good
The managers were approachable and staff described good teamwork and communication. Regular audits, feedback and follow-up checks were used to monitor and improve the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with minor improvements needed in recruitment records and medicine checks.

This was an unannounced, comprehensive inspection on 29 October 2018. Inspectors spoke with people living at the home, relatives, health professionals and staff. They observed care, looked around the building and checked care, medicine, staff and quality records.

The home remained Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines procedures, suitable training, respectful care, personalised care plans and a range of activities.

There were two minor record-keeping points. Some staff files did not contain a written health declaration, and inspectors discussed more frequent checks for some controlled medicines that were not given every day. Managers said these points would be addressed.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives said they had no safety concerns. Inspectors found enough staff and effective safeguarding, building safety and risk management arrangements.

    “People living at Ward Green lodge said they felt safe and they liked the staff.” from the report
  • Safe medicines support

    Medicines were stored, given and recorded safely in the records checked. Staff were observed giving medicines calmly and without interruption.

    “Medicines were obtained, stored, administered and disposed of safely by staff.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff treated people with dignity and respect. They knocked before entering rooms, asked permission and supported people to choose where they spent their time.

    “We saw people were cared for and supported by staff that were kind, patient and respectful.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's needs, interests, likes and dislikes. Staff knew people's preferences and provided a range of activities.

    “They included clear information on the person's identified need, interests, hobbies, likes and dislikes so that these could be respected.” from the report
  • Good oversight

    Managers used regular audits and feedback to monitor the home. Inspectors saw evidence that identified improvements were checked later.

    “We saw that where audits identified something could be improved, the next audit checked the improvement had been made” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Missing health declarations

    needs fixing

    The three staff recruitment files checked did not contain written health declarations. Managers said the discussions had happened verbally and agreed to record them for all staff.

    “We found some improvements to staff recruitment files were needed because the files we checked did not contain a staff health declaration” from the report
  • Controlled medicine checks

    minor

    Inspectors asked the service to increase the frequency of checks for some controlled medicines that were not administered daily. The manager said this would happen immediately.

    “We discussed with the business and compliance manager about increasing the frequency of checks for some CDs that weren't administered on a daily basis.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have written health declarations now been completed and recorded for every member of staff?
  2. 02How often are controlled medicines now checked when they are not administered every day?
  3. 03How do you check that staffing levels continue to match residents' changing needs?
  4. 04How are activities adapted for people who cannot join group activities or who have changing interests?
  5. 05How will my relative and our family be involved in reviewing the care plan when needs change?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five questions, and the Good ratings remained unchanged from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 November 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Ward Green Lodge

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Ward Green Lodge →

  2. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2014

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 November 2014.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 99 live-in carers within about an hour of Barnsley

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 82 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Ivy was very kind and gentle in all her dealings with my late mother. They got on very well and were able to share a joke and a laugh.”
Robert P., about Rumbidzai Ivy G.
See live-in carers near BarnsleyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.