Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Brickfields Cottage

Goodpublished 29 December 2017, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found that risks were assessed and managed, staffing levels were sufficient, recruitment checks were completed and medicines were safely stored and managed.
Effective?
Good
Staff had training, supervision and support. People received help with nutrition, hydration and healthcare, and staff supported people to make decisions as independently as possible.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with kindness, respected their privacy and protected their dignity. Relatives were encouraged to visit and be involved where appropriate.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans reflected people's needs, preferences and life histories. People were supported with household tasks, community activities and other interests, and relatives said concerns were dealt with appropriately.
Well-led?
Good
The registered manager and provider sought feedback and held regular staff meetings. Audits covered areas such as medicines, fire safety and the environment, and identified shortfalls were acted on promptly.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2017

Turning Point - Brickfields Cottage was rated Good; inspectors found safe, caring and personalised support with effective management.

This was an unannounced, comprehensive inspection on 28 November 2017. One inspector observed the home, spoke with staff, the registered manager and a visiting healthcare professional, and reviewed care, staff and management records. Relatives of four people were contacted afterwards because people living at the home could not share their views directly.

The home supported six people with learning disabilities. Inspectors found suitable risk assessments, enough trained staff, safe medicines arrangements and a clean environment. People were supported with food, drink, healthcare decisions and activities suited to their needs.

Staff were described and observed as kind, respectful and thoughtful. Care plans were personal and regularly reviewed. Relatives were encouraged to give feedback, and the provider had systems to check quality and act on shortfalls.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The overall rating remained Good, as it had been at the previous inspection in January 2017.

What inspectors praised
  • Risks managed

    The home assessed risks across people's daily lives and put steps in place to reduce them. Inspectors also found enough staff to meet people's needs.

    “Risks to people's safety and wellbeing were identified across all aspects of their lives and control measures were in place to reduce these risks.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were observed comforting people and treating them thoughtfully. Privacy, dignity and personal choices were respected.

    “We observed staff interacting with people in a thoughtful and considerate way.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care records described people's abilities, preferences and life histories. Staff supported people to take part in activities at home and in the community.

    “People's care records contained personalised information about them, such as their preferences and life history.” from the report
  • Quality checks

    The provider used audits to check important areas of the service. The report gives an example of a fire door problem being reported and repaired promptly.

    “Where shortfalls were identified, records demonstrated that these were acted upon promptly.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What is the current position of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards applications that were still pending at the inspection?
  2. 02How do you support each person to make choices if they cannot communicate verbally?
  3. 03What end of life and bereavement training has been arranged since the inspection?
  4. 04How are care plans reviewed when a person's needs or preferences change?
  5. 05How do you check that medicines continue to be administered safely and that stock matches the records?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions, and the report says the ratings remained Good from the previous inspection in January 2017. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 December 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Brickfields Cottage

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2017Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Brickfields Cottage →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 8 February 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Hertfordshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,300 a week. 82 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She handled the new situation in front of her with such professionalism and I felt I could trust her 100%.”
Siobhan D., about Sithabile Tabile M.
“She was v competent and confident and we felt our mum was safe in her care. She supported us through a difficult time.”
Lucy D., about Loritha C.
See live-in carers near HertfordshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.