CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at Tryfan House
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Staffing levels were safe and medicines were well managed. However, some risk records did not contain enough detail about distressed behaviour, incidents or physical restraint, and worn keypads created an access risk.
- Effective?
- Good
- People's food, drink and healthcare needs were well managed, and staff had relevant training and support. The environment was not always dementia friendly or homely, and some best-interest decisions did not show how relatives or advocates had been involved.
- Caring?
- Good
- People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. However, staff from other homes could access care records for people at this home, which posed a confidentiality risk.
- Responsive?
- Good
- Care was generally personalised, and staff knew people's preferences. Some care plans lacked important detail or had not been updated after people's needs changed.
- Well-led?
- Requires improvement
- Staff and relatives gave positive feedback about the management team, and managers were open to the inspection. Quality assurance checks had not always identified or addressed problems promptly.
What inspectors found, June 2023
Rated Good overall, but inspectors found improvements were needed in management oversight and confidentiality.
Inspectors visited without notice on 24 and 30 May 2023. They spoke with relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care plans, medicines, recruitment records and management systems.
People were seen to be relaxed and supported by staff who knew them well. Inspectors found safe staffing, well-managed medicines, kind care, suitable food and drink support, healthcare access and activities tailored to people's needs.
There were weaknesses in some records, cleaning, recruitment checks and the home environment. Care records did not always give enough detail about distressed behaviour, restraint or people's current needs. Records could also be accessed by staff from other homes, creating a confidentiality risk.
The overall rating was Good. Safe, Effective, Caring and Responsive were rated Good. Well-led was rated Requires Improvement because quality checks had not always found or dealt with problems promptly. This was the first inspection of the newly registered service. The previous premises had been rated Inadequate in June 2022.
Kind and respectful care
Inspectors observed helpful, reassuring interactions. Relatives said staff treated people with respect and knew them well.
“People were treated with respect and kindness by staff.” from the report
Medicines managed safely
Medicines were given safely and kindly, at the right time. Audits were described as thorough and effective.
“Medicines were administered safely and in a kind way. Records showed people received their medicines at the right time.” from the report
Food and drink support
People's nutrition and hydration needs were assessed and monitored. Staff took action when people were at risk of weight loss.
“People's nutritional and hydration needs were well managed.” from the report
Activities and relationships
People were offered regular group and one-to-one activities based on their preferences. The home also supported people to maintain important relationships.
“There was a regular and varied programme of indoor and outdoor activities to promote people's wellbeing and interaction.” from the report
Incomplete risk information
seriousRecords did not always explain people's triggers, the purpose of distressed behaviour or the techniques staff should use. Monitoring after falls or physical restraint was also limited.
“Risk assessments and care records did not always detail the function of the behaviour, triggers or de-escalation techniques staff should use.” from the report
Confidentiality risk
needs fixingStaff working in the other homes on the same grounds could access care records for people at this home. The report says work was under way to address this.
“Staff working in those homes had access to care documentation related to people living at Tryfan house.” from the report
Management checks missed problems
needs fixingAudits did not identify issues found by inspectors, including stained cups and bowls, care plan gaps and recruitment record problems. The provider was asked to review its quality assurance and management oversight.
“We recommend the provider reviews their quality assurance and management oversight processes to ensure these are effective in identifying and addressing areas for improvement.” from the report
Some care plans were out of date
needs fixingSome plans lacked important details, including equipment instructions and a person's updated diet. The manager said the plans would be reviewed.
“Some areas of the care plan were accurate and others still mentioned their previous dietary requirements.” from the report
Environment and cleanliness
minorSome areas needed redecorating and were not always dementia friendly or homely. Inspectors also found stained cups and a stained bowl that needed immediate action.
“Although there was ongoing cleaning happening, we found examples of some areas at the home or objects used by people were not being clean.” from the report
- 01What has been done to stop staff from the other homes accessing this home's care records?
- 02How are care plans checked and updated after a fall, restraint, diet change or other change in need?
- 03What changes have been made to record people's triggers and the de-escalation techniques staff should use?
- 04How are quality checks now made independent enough to identify problems that earlier audits missed?
- 05What is the timetable for making the environment more dementia friendly and completing the redecoration?
This was an unannounced planned inspection covering all five key questions; it was the first inspection of the newly registered service. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 June 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Tryfan House
Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.
- June 2023Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2023
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 February 2023.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Leeds
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 89 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
“Took his time to learn about me read my care plan and to listen to me. great companionship with lots of laughing.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.