Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Tikvah Woodpeckers

Goodpublished 5 December 2017, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2017

Tikvah Woodpeckers was rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe and personalised care, with some records and privacy issues to address.

This was an unannounced inspection by one inspector. The report says the visit took place on 14 November 2017. Inspectors reviewed records for three people, observed care in communal areas, spoke with four staff and received feedback from other professionals.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines practice, suitable risk assessments and staff who understood people's individual needs.

People were supported with kindness, respect, choice and meaningful activities. Their care plans were detailed and personalised. The home had a registered manager and systems to monitor and improve care.

Inspectors also found some shortfalls. Training records were not fully accurate, supervision arrangements had fallen behind the provider's timetable, and bathroom windows might not provide enough privacy at night. These issues were being addressed, but families should ask how they were resolved.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs safely. Medicines were given by trained staff and no administration errors had been reported in the previous 12 months.

    “People continued to be given their medicines safely by staff who were appropriately trained to administer medicines and whose competency to do so was tested regularly.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff knew people well and responded to their communication, including facial expressions and body language. Inspectors saw care that was friendly, caring and respectful.

    “People continued to be supported by a dedicated and caring staff team who knew them well.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans covered people's individual needs, preferences, communication and routines. They were reviewed and changed when people's needs changed.

    “People's care remained totally person centred and support plans were detailed and personalised.” from the report
  • Activities and community life

    People were offered flexible activities, outings, day trips and short holidays. Activities were matched to their abilities, preferences, moods and wellbeing.

    “The service continued to provide people with a flexible activities programme which responded to their abilities, preferences, choices, moods and well-being.” from the report
  • Management and improvement

    The home had audits, action plans and systems for listening to people, families and staff. Inspectors found the service continued to be well-led.

    “The service was monitored and assessed by the manager, staff team and provider to ensure the standard of care offered was maintained and improved.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines training records

    needs fixing

    The training record gave the wrong frequency for classroom-based medicines training. The organisation knew about the discrepancy and was working to correct it.

    “We noted from the staff training record that there was an error in the required frequency of classroom based medicines training.” from the report
  • Training records

    needs fixing

    Most mandatory training was up to date, but some completed training had not been recorded by the training department. The provider was addressing this.

    “However, the record was not entirely accurate as training that had been undertaken had not been acknowledged or recorded by the training department.” from the report
  • Staff supervision

    needs fixing

    Formal supervision had fallen short of the provider's requirements. New dates had been scheduled, although staff said support and guidance were available.

    “The registered manager acknowledged that this programme had fallen short of the providers requirements but dates were now scheduled to meet the timescales.” from the report
  • Bathroom privacy

    needs fixing

    Bathroom windows had no blinds. The obscure glass might not provide enough privacy, particularly at night, so the manager agreed to investigate further.

    “Whilst the glass used was of an obscure nature it was not thought that this would provide sufficient privacy particularly at night on its own.” from the report
  • DoLS applications

    needs fixing

    The home had been advised to apply for authorisations for all seven residents. The manager had done this but was still checking whether applications were needed for at least two people.

    “The registered manager had complied with this request but was not entirely convinced of the need with at least two of the people living in the service.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has been done to correct the medicines training frequency and make sure the training records are accurate?
  2. 02Are staff now receiving formal supervision within the provider's required timescales?
  3. 03What was the outcome of the investigation into privacy in the bathroom windows, especially at night?
  4. 04What is the current position on the DoLS applications for all seven people, including the two applications the manager questioned?
  5. 05How can a person with limited verbal communication raise a complaint or show that they are unhappy with their care?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five questions, although the report gives conflicting dates and also lists 19 October 2017 as the inspection visit date. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 December 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Tikvah Woodpeckers

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2017Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Tikvah Woodpeckers →

  2. October 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

78 live-in carers within about an hour of Wokingham

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 71 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“I can truly say that Peter always put Dad at the centre of everything and I know that they found a great friendship in difficult times.”
Lindsay C., about Peter W.
“Not only has she looked after him beautifully, she has also been great company for him with lively conversation, kindness and humour.”
Clare M., about Zion S.
See live-in carers near WokinghamProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.