Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Three Elms

Goodpublished 7 November 2019, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about most infection prevention and control arrangements, including visiting, testing, admissions, protective equipment and outbreak management. They were only somewhat assured about hygiene and the layout of the premises.
Effective?
Good
This question was not inspected as part of this targeted visit.
Caring?
Good
This question was not inspected as part of this targeted visit.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not inspected as part of this targeted visit.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not inspected as part of this targeted visit.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found that COVID-19 infection controls were mostly safe, but hygiene was not consistent in some areas.

This was a targeted inspection on 18 March 2022 after a recent COVID-19 outbreak. Inspectors looked mainly at infection prevention and control, and asked about staffing pressures.

The outbreak was managed safely. Visiting procedures, testing, protective equipment and staff training were in place. Visitors were kept informed about arrangements and their relative's wellbeing.

Inspectors were assured about most infection controls. They were only somewhat assured about the layout and hygiene of the home because good hygiene was not consistent in some areas. The service was inspected but not rated.

What inspectors praised
  • Outbreak management

    The recent COVID-19 outbreak was managed in line with government guidance.

    “The outbreak was safely managed in line with government guidance.” from the report
  • Protective equipment and training

    Staff had up-to-date infection control guidance, training and a good supply of protective equipment. Inspectors saw it being used and disposed of safely.

    “Staff were provided with the most up to date infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance and were trained in IPC including how to safely use and remove personal protective equipment (PPE).” from the report
  • Family communication

    Visitors understood the visiting arrangements and said staff kept them informed during the outbreak.

    “Visitors told us they were kept informed about visiting arrangements and that staff had contacted them during the outbreak to keep them informed about the wellbeing of their relative.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Inconsistent hygiene

    needs fixing

    Some areas of the home did not have consistent good hygiene practices. Inspectors signposted the provider to resources to improve its approach.

    “Good hygiene practices were not consistent in some areas of the home.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Which areas of the home had inconsistent hygiene during the inspection, and what action has been taken since?
  2. 02How do you check that cleaning and hygiene remain consistent throughout the home?
  3. 03How would you keep families informed if there were another COVID-19 outbreak?
  4. 04How often are residents and staff tested during an outbreak, and how are the records checked?
  5. 05What staffing measures would be used if COVID-19 caused staff pressures?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, with questions about staffing pressures; it did not provide ratings for the other four questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 15 April 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and safe visiting arrangements.

The CQC carried out an announced, targeted inspection on 3 December 2020. It followed concerns about infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found safe arrangements for visitors and new admissions. Staff followed shielding, social distancing and personal protective equipment guidance. The home also supported residents to keep in touch with family and friends using technology.

The inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed, including testing, cleaning, hygiene, outbreak planning and the use of protective equipment. The home was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe visiting

    The home had a specific visiting area and procedures intended to reduce the spread of infection while keeping families in contact.

    “The service followed safe visiting procedures to minimise the spread of infection.” from the report
  • Protective equipment

    There was a good supply of suitable protective equipment, and staff used and disposed of it correctly.

    “There was a good stock of the right standard of PPE and staff used and disposed of it correctly.” from the report
  • Safe admissions

    People newly admitted to the home were given extra support to protect their health and wellbeing.

    “Safe procedures were in place for admitting people into the service.” from the report
  • Infection control systems

    Inspectors found current infection control guidance, updates and good practice being shared with staff.

    “The registered manager and provider shared infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance, updates and good practice across the staff team.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are family visits arranged now, and what infection control measures are currently used?
  2. 02How are people safely admitted to the home, including any extra support during their first days?
  3. 03How do you check that staff are using and disposing of protective equipment correctly?
  4. 04How do you manage and communicate any infection outbreak?
  5. 05When was the home last assessed on care that this targeted inspection did not cover, such as caring, responsive and well-led care?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures during the coronavirus pandemic; it did not assess the other areas of care. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 February 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Three Elms

3 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. April 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Three Elms →

  2. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Three Elms →

  3. November 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. February 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warrington

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 90 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“He developed a close affinity with Terence, spending time talking with him before he retired to bed and looking after his needs during the night.”
John P., about Rodrigo Javier B.
See live-in carers near WarringtonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.