Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Thorn Park Care Home

Goodpublished 21 May 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2018

Thorn Park Care Home is rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe and personalised care, with several minor issues addressed during or after the inspection.

Inspectors visited the home without notice on 19, 20 and 23 April 2018. They spoke with people living there, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and meals, checked care and staff records, and reviewed medicines, equipment, fire safety and quality checks.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People told inspectors they felt safe and well cared for. Staff were described as kind, patient and respectful, and people received support that reflected their needs, choices and routines.

Inspectors found enough staff, good staff training, suitable support with health, food and drinks, a range of activities and thoughtful end-of-life care. They also found some issues, including food safety, a possible stair risk and incomplete recording for some short stays. These issues were addressed during or after the inspection, and no serious risks or concerns were identified.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Inspectors also found enough staff and prompt responses to requests for help.

    “There were adequate numbers of staff to keep people safe and we saw requests for help were responded to promptly.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were patient and compassionate, including when people had dementia or found communication difficult. People's privacy, dignity and choices were respected.

    “People were offered comfort and support when they found it hard to express themselves.” from the report
  • Personalised activities and choices

    People could choose where and when they received support. Activities, outings and informal social contact were offered to suit people's interests and abilities.

    “People were able to take part in a range of activities according to their interests and hobbies.” from the report
  • Good end-of-life support

    Staff had specific training and worked with other organisations to follow people's wishes and keep them comfortable at the end of life.

    “People could be confident that at the end of their lives they would be cared for with kindness and compassion and their comfort would be maintained.” from the report
  • Active quality checks

    The management team used audits, feedback, complaints and incidents to identify improvements. People living at the home were also involved in decisions about the service.

    “The provider used complaints and incidents to continually improve the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Insulin stock records

    needs fixing

    The home was not accounting for insulin stock held for community nurses. The report says this was resolved by the home and nurses keeping clear records.

    “The only issue we found was the service was not accounting for the stock of insulin that was held for the community nursing team to administer; this has now been resolved with the service and the nurses keeping clear records.” from the report
  • Food cross-contamination controls

    needs fixing

    Kitchen procedures did not fully follow current guidance in every area of food production. The required changes were put in place immediately with support from Environmental Health.

    “However, we noted in the kitchen the service was not fully following current guidelines to prevent cross contamination in all areas of their food production.” from the report
  • Two stairways

    needs fixing

    Two stairways behind doors that could not be seen through might have posed a risk to people with cognitive impairment. Warning signs were not considered understandable for everyone, and keypads were fitted afterwards.

    “These could potentially lead to a risk for people who cannot understand the risk this could pose.” from the report
  • Short-stay care goals

    minor

    For some people staying temporarily, care plans did not clearly record the person's goal. This meant useful evidence of support to help people return home was missed.

    “We spoke with the registered manager in respect of people's care plans for those staying at the home for a short stay, as it was not always clear what the goal for the person was.” from the report
  • Medicines staff duties

    needs fixing

    Inspectors reminded the home that staff giving medicines should not be asked to complete another task at the same time. Systems were put in place during the inspection.

    “We also, reminded the registered manager of the importance not allowing the staff member administering medicines to be asked to complete any other task.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are insulin stocks and other medicines checked and recorded now?
  2. 02What procedures are currently used to prevent cross-contamination in the kitchen?
  3. 03What changes were made to the two stairways, and how are people with dementia supported to use them safely?
  4. 04How are goals and progress recorded for people who come for a short stay?
  5. 05How do you make sure staff administering medicines are not given another task at the same time?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions, and the Good ratings continued from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 25 May 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Thorn Park Care Home

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. May 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Thorn Park Care Home →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 April 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

9 live-in carers within about an hour of Plymouth

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

8 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.

See live-in carers near PlymouthProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.