Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at The Village Nursing and Care Home @ Murton

Goodpublished 24 December 2019, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People told inspectors they felt safe. Risks were assessed, medicines were managed safely, recruitment checks were in place and the environment and equipment were well maintained.
Effective?
Good
Staff were trained and supported, people's health was monitored and relevant professionals were involved. People were supported with food, drink and decisions about their care.
Caring?
Good
Staff were kind and caring and respected people's privacy, dignity, beliefs and independence. People and relatives were involved in care decisions.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were personalised and people had choice and control. The home supported relationships, communication needs, complaints and end-of-life preferences, although people had mixed views about activities.
Well-led?
Good
The home had approachable management, good teamwork and systems to monitor quality. Feedback from people, relatives and staff was used to make improvements.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2019

The Village Nursing and Care Home @ Murton was rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe and well-organised care, with some mixed views about activities.

This was the first inspection since the home registered with the CQC. It was unannounced and took place on 21 November 2019. Inspectors spoke with people living there, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional. They also observed care and checked care, medicine, staff and quality records.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People said they were happy with their care. Inspectors found safe staffing and recruitment, safe medicines, clean premises, detailed care plans and good links with health professionals.

Staff were described as kind, respectful and supportive of people's independence, choices, privacy and family relationships. People had mixed views about activities, but the provider had appointed two activities co-ordinators to increase what was available.

Good means the home met the CQC standard in all five areas at this inspection. It does not mean that every part of the service was perfect, or that circumstances cannot change.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People said they felt safe and staff understood how to protect them from abuse and avoidable harm.

    “I feel safe and secure here” from the report
  • Safe care and medicines

    Inspectors found that risks were reviewed, equipment was safe and medicines were managed by trained staff with regular checks.

    “Medicine audits and checks were completed regularly.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Staff built caring relationships and respected people's privacy, dignity, beliefs and independence.

    “The staff maintained the privacy and dignity of the people they cared for.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans described people's individual needs and people and relatives were involved in creating them.

    “People had personalised care plans. They clearly described the care and support people required to meet their needs.” from the report
  • Good management

    The provider monitored the service, sought feedback and used it to make changes and improvements.

    “The provider had an effective quality assurance system to review areas of the service and to drive improvement.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Mixed views about activities

    minor

    Some people wanted more activities and said there had not been much going on recently. The provider had responded by appointing two activities co-ordinators and planning activities seven days a week.

    “There has not been much going on lately but hopefully there will be soon, we have been told.” from the report
  • Staff could be busy

    minor

    Some people said staff were very busy at times. Inspectors still found there were enough staff and that people's needs were met in a timely way.

    “Some commented that staff were very busy at times but told us their needs were met.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What activities are now offered seven days a week, and how do you check that they suit each person's interests?
  2. 02How do you make sure staffing levels remain sufficient when staff are busy or people’s needs change?
  3. 03How are medicines audits followed up if a problem is found?
  4. 04How are people's personalised care plans reviewed with them and their relatives?
  5. 05How does the home use feedback from people, relatives and staff to make further improvements?

This was an unannounced first inspection covering all five CQC questions, including the premises and care provided; inspectors reviewed four people's care and medication records. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 December 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Village Nursing and Care Home @ Murton

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. December 2019Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Village Nursing and Care Home @ Murton →

  2. October 2018

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 October 2018.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

47 live-in carers within about an hour of County Durham

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £960 to £1,210 a week. 42 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Petty introduced herself to Mum every time she was caring for her and responded very quickly to Mum if she was distressed in the night.”
Judith W., about Petty Tutsirai C.
See live-in carers near County DurhamProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.