Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at The Old Vicarage at Airmyn

Goodpublished 14 February 2020, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control. This included cleaning, visitor arrangements, protective equipment, testing, social distancing and outbreak management.
Effective?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

The Old Vicarage at Airmyn was inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed well.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 10 March 2021. It looked at infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found regular testing for visitors, staff and residents. Visits were managed to reduce risks, and the home was clean, uncluttered and free from odours.

Inspectors were assured about the use of protective equipment, social distancing, admissions, testing and the arrangements for preventing or managing outbreaks.

The service was inspected but not rated. This report does not provide an overall quality rating or ratings for the other areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection prevention

    Inspectors were assured that the home had suitable arrangements to reduce the spread of infection, including cleaning, testing and protective equipment.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
  • Testing and visits

    The home had regular testing for visitors, staff and residents. Staff managed visits to help keep people safe.

    “A documented regular testing regime was in place for visitors, staff and people living in the home.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    The home was described as clean and free from clutter and unpleasant smells.

    “The home was clean, uncluttered and odour free.” from the report
  • Safe shared areas

    There were several comfortable areas where residents could sit and relax while maintaining social distancing.

    “The home has several homely areas where people can sit and relax, this allows for comfortable social distancing which was also respected by staff.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are visitors currently tested and managed?
  2. 02How do you check that staff are using protective equipment safely and effectively?
  3. 03How often are shared areas cleaned, and how is this recorded?
  4. 04What arrangements are in place if there is an infection outbreak?
  5. 05What recent information can you provide about the wider quality of care, which this inspection did not assess?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic; the service was inspected but not rated and the other areas were not covered. This explanation was written from the published report of 7 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2020

The Old Vicarage at Airmyn was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care across all five areas.

This was an unannounced, planned inspection on 14 January 2020. Inspectors spoke with six people living at the home, two relatives, a health professional and six staff. They reviewed care, medicines, staff and management records.

The home was rated Good overall. It was rated Good for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found people were safe, treated with kindness and supported according to their needs and preferences.

The home provided personal care for up to 22 older people, including some people living with dementia. Staff supported people with medicines, meals, activities, healthcare and maintaining relationships. Some environmental improvements and record reviews were still in progress.

This was the first inspection after a change of provider for the location. The previous rating was also Good, published on 9 December 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    Staff numbers were adjusted when people's needs changed. Inspectors found medicines were received, stored, given and disposed of safely.

    “Medicines were received, stored, administered and disposed of safely.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care records described people's individual needs and preferences. People were involved in their care planning where they were able to be.

    “Care records included information to provide person centred, safe care according to people's individual preferences.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful support

    Staff offered reassurance, listened to people and supported privacy, dignity and independence.

    “They do respect my privacy, shut the toilet door, ask me if I'm okay, all very respectful.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to go out, attend community activities, see family and friends, and maintain important relationships.

    “We go to the local pub and take people to Church.” from the report
  • Approachable management

    Inspectors found that management was visible and open with people, relatives and staff. Feedback and incidents were used to improve the service.

    “The registered manager was visible around the home and engaged openly with people, their families and staff.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Care records still being reviewed

    minor

    Some care records were being reviewed so they reflected the signed input of decision-makers. Ask how this work was completed and kept up to date.

    “Care records were under review to ensure they reflected the signed input of the decision makers.” from the report
  • Environmental improvements not complete

    minor

    Some planned changes to the building and flooring were still in progress, including work intended to support people living with dementia.

    “Planned improvements were in progress with an emphasis on best practice options to support people living with dementia.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have the planned improvements to the courtyard access and flooring been completed, and what other dementia-friendly changes have been made?
  2. 02Have care records been updated to show the signed input of decision-makers where needed?
  3. 03How do you adjust staffing when people's needs change, and how is this monitored now?
  4. 04How often are environment and equipment safety checks audited, and were all outstanding checks completed?
  5. 05How are each person's end-of-life wishes recorded and reviewed with them or their representatives?

This was a first planned inspection after a change of provider and covered the premises, care and all five CQC questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 February 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Old Vicarage at Airmyn

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. April 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at The Old Vicarage at Airmyn →

  2. February 2020Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Old Vicarage at Airmyn →

  3. March 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 11 March 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

16 live-in carers within about an hour of East Riding of Yorkshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,030 to £1,420 a week. 14 can care for a couple. 7 years' experience on average.

“She was always 'just present enough': attentive, available, kind and engaging, but without ever over-stepping any boundary”
Beatrice N., about Rosemary H.
“What truly stands out is how mindful and attentive she is to all of my medical needs, always going above and beyond to ensure I’m comfortable and well cared for.”
Lucy K., about Emma H.
See live-in carers near East Riding of YorkshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.