Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at The Meadow

Goodpublished 19 February 2026, 7 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

The Meadow was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and highly personalised care, with a focused inspection covering three areas.

Inspectors visited unannounced on 30 October 2023. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed activities and lunch, and checked care plans, medicines records, recruitment files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe, Responsive and Well-led. People and relatives said they felt safe. Inspectors found safe staffing and medicines systems, personalised care, meaningful activities, good end-of-life support and effective management checks.

This was a focused inspection. Effective and Caring were not inspected during this visit. The overall Good rating used the previous ratings for the questions that were not inspected. The last inspection was published in October 2017 and the overall rating was also Good.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff understood safeguarding and how to report concerns.

    “People and relatives told us the home was safe.” from the report
  • Personalised activities

    The home offered varied activities linked to people's interests, wellbeing and relationships. These included exercise, music, reminiscence, creative activities and links with local groups.

    “The service was very responsive to people's needs. People were at the heart of everything they did.” from the report
  • End-of-life support

    Care plans recorded people's wishes in detail. Staff worked with hospice and palliative care services and helped people receive dignified, personal support at the end of life.

    “People were supported at the end of their life to have a comfortable, dignified and pain free death.” from the report
  • Strong management checks

    Management had regular audits and followed up issues. Inspectors found a culture of learning and improvement.

    “The provider had a clear management structure that monitored the quality of care to drive improvements in service delivery.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Not everyone had been asked for their views

    minor

    Most people and relatives said they were involved, but some people said they had not been given the opportunity to give their views. Inspectors also saw evidence of a survey with positive overall results.

    “Some people told us they had not been given the opportunity to give their views.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure my relative and our family are given regular opportunities to give feedback?
  2. 02Which of my relative's interests, preferences and communication needs would be recorded in their care plan?
  3. 03What activities would be suitable for my relative, especially if they are living with dementia?
  4. 04How would you record and follow my relative's end-of-life wishes?
  5. 05How would you explain which care areas were not assessed during the latest focused inspection?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe, Responsive and Well-led; Effective and Caring were not inspected and their previous ratings were used to calculate the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2017

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some improvements needed for visual impairment and dining space.

This was an unannounced inspection on 5 and 7 September 2017. Inspectors spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and checked care plans, medicines records, staff files, complaints and quality checks.

The home remained Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found people were safe, medicines were managed properly, staff understood people's needs and care plans were personalised.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Staff supported independence, activities and religious or spiritual needs. The home had systems for listening to concerns, reviewing care and checking the quality of its service.

Inspectors also noted some areas for improvement. Staff did not yet have specialist training for supporting people with visual impairments. Dining areas could be cramped, and dementia-friendly signage and colour changes were not yet in place.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines

    Inspectors observed safe medicines administration and found no gaps in the medicines administration records they checked.

    “The service followed safe medicines management practices. Staff were trained in medicines administration and their medicines competency assessments were in date.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were seen speaking kindly, listening to people and responding to their needs. People and relatives said staff respected privacy and dignity.

    “We saw the registered manager and staff talked to people in a kind and caring manner, listened to their needs patiently and met them promptly.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans included people's histories, preferences, health needs and interests. Staff could explain how they supported individuals.

    “People's care plans were comprehensive and individualised, and gave instructions to staff on how to support people to provide person-centred care.” from the report
  • Activities and spiritual support

    The home offered group and one-to-one activities, including exercise, music, massage and pet therapy. People were also supported with religious and spiritual needs.

    “The service worked well with other organisations in providing creative, meaningful activities to improve people's emotional well-being such as pet therapy and mother and baby group.” from the report
  • Good management and checks

    The management encouraged people and staff to raise concerns. Inspectors found regular audits, surveys and action plans to monitor the quality of care.

    “The service maintained robust data management and monitoring systems and processes to ensure the safety and quality of the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Visual impairment training

    needs fixing

    A few visually impaired people said staff had limited knowledge of how to support them. The manager said training had been scheduled, but inspectors found it had not yet been provided.

    “We looked at staff training records that demonstrated staff did not receive specialist training in working with people who were visually impaired.” from the report
  • Cramped dining areas

    needs fixing

    Some dining rooms did not have enough space for everyone and their mobility aids. The management said refurbishment plans would be put forward to the provider.

    “Three people and two relatives commented how lunch could be awkward in the dining rooms due to lack of space.” from the report
  • Dementia-friendly environment

    needs fixing

    The home did not yet have enough signage or colour changes to help people with dementia find rooms and facilities. Refurbishment plans were in place.

    “there was a lack of signage and colour zoned walls to support people with dementia in accessing various rooms and facilities in the service.” from the report
  • Busy lunchtime staffing

    minor

    Some relatives felt staff could be stretched during the day, especially at lunchtime. Inspectors saw managers helping during meals and found call bells were answered promptly.

    “Generally speaking there is enough staff but there are times during the day that they are stretched such as at lunchtime” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What specialist training have staff now completed for supporting people who are visually impaired?
  2. 02What changes have been made to provide more space in the dining rooms for people and their mobility aids?
  3. 03Have the planned dementia-friendly signs and colour-zoned walls been installed?
  4. 04How many staff are available at lunchtime, and what happens when staff are stretched?
  5. 05How will you make sure care plans continue to be reviewed when people's needs change?

This was an unannounced inspection covering the overall quality of the home and all five CQC questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 October 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Meadow

4 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Meadow →

  2. October 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Meadow →

  3. December 2015Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 22 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Haringey

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 75 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Over the time he spent with them he got to know our parents very well and became like part of the family, even joining in family celebrations.”
Alison S., about Abdu M.
“Violet is a kind and positive, caring person and we are lucky and delighted to have her caring for our 96 year old grandmother.”
Charlotte T., about Violet j.
See live-in carers near HaringeyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.