CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at The Manor House - Frenchay
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, March 2019
Rated Outstanding overall; inspectors found exceptionally caring, responsive and well-led support, with safe and effective care rated Good.
This was an unannounced inspection on 8 and 10 January 2019. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff, the provider and health professionals. They reviewed care records, staff files, rotas, medicines, training, incidents, maintenance and quality checks.
The home was rated Outstanding overall. Caring, Responsive and Well-led were rated Outstanding. Safe and Effective were rated Good. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines procedures, suitable training and good support with health needs.
People were supported to make choices, stay involved with family and take part in activities they enjoyed. Inspectors found detailed personalised care plans and staff who knew people very well. The home was larger than current best practice guidance suggests, but it had been divided into three smaller units to reduce the impact.
Personalised support
Care plans described people's needs, preferences, history and wishes. Staff supported people at their own pace and helped them work towards personal goals.
“Care plans gave staff clear guidance and direction about how to provide care and support that met people's needs and wishes.” from the report
Strong leadership
Inspectors found an open and supportive management approach. Staff felt valued, involved and able to suggest improvements.
“People were at the heart of everything the service did.” from the report
Safe staffing and medicines
There were enough staff to meet people's needs, and staff giving medicines had their competence checked. Recruitment checks and safety systems were in place.
“People were supported by sufficient staff.” from the report
The home is larger than best-practice guidance
minorThe home was registered for up to 23 people and was larger than most domestic-style properties. It was split into three units, which inspectors said reduced the negative impact, but families should consider whether the overall size is suitable.
“However, the service was a large manor house, which was larger than most domestic style properties and was registered to support up to 23 people.” from the report
Some DoLS decisions were delayed
minorApplications for safeguards had been submitted on time, but some authorisations were delayed while placing authorities waited to allocate an assessor. Inspectors said this was outside the home's control.
“Applications had been submitted in a timely manner however, there were some delays which were out of the services control.” from the report
- 01How are the three units staffed, and how do you make sure my relative receives consistent support across the home?
- 02How will you support my relative to set, review and achieve their own goals and activities?
- 03How do you check that staff understand my relative's communication needs, especially if they cannot communicate verbally?
- 04What is the current position on any delayed Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards authorisations?
- 05How will you involve our family in care reviews and keep us informed about changes in my relative's health or wellbeing?
This was an unannounced inspection covering all five key questions; the report says the last inspection was in June 2016 and found no breaches. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 March 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of The Manor House - Frenchay
2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.
- March 2019Outstandingcurrent ratingup from GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding
- August 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
39 live-in carers within about an hour of South Gloucestershire
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £1,020 to £1,280 a week. 32 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.