Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at The Lodge Care Home

Goodpublished 17 September 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2022

Rated Requires Improvement, with Safe rated Inadequate because medicines and risk management were unsafe.

This was the first inspection under the new provider. It was unannounced and took place on 5 July 2022. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and managers, observed care, and checked care plans, medicines and other records.

The most serious problems were with medicines. Staff gave insulin without suitable training or competency checks. Records, storage and medicine checks were also unreliable. Care plans and risk assessments were not always current, staffing was not sufficient, and some people's food, fluids and personal support needs were not properly met.

People and relatives said staff were friendly and caring. Staff were recruited appropriately, received induction and training in many areas, and worked with health professionals. However, management checks had not found or fixed important problems. The home was rated Requires Improvement overall, with all five areas needing improvement and Safe rated Inadequate.

What inspectors praised
  • Recruitment checks

    The provider carried out appropriate recruitment checks, including criminal background checks, references and checks on identity and eligibility to work.

    “Staff were recruited by the provider appropriately. This included carrying out criminal background checks, obtaining references, proof of their identify and eligibility to work.” from the report
  • Safeguarding processes

    There were procedures to protect people from abuse. Staff had safeguarding training and understood how to report concerns.

    “Staff had received training in safeguarding people from abuse. Staff were able to describe the procedures they would follow should they identify people at risk of abuse.” from the report
  • Working with health professionals

    Staff worked with GPs, district nurses, physiotherapists and other professionals to support people's health and wellbeing.

    “The staff and management team worked with health professionals to ensure people were in the best of health.” from the report
  • Family contact

    People were able to maintain contact with family and friends through visits, telephone calls and video calls.

    “People were supported to maintain relationships with family and friends to avoid social isolation. They were able to have visitors and keep in regular contact with them by telephone or video call.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe medicines

    serious

    Medicines were not consistently given as prescribed, recorded correctly or stored safely. Insulin was given by staff without suitable training or competency checks.

    “Medicines were not managed safely. We found concerns which put people at risk of unsafe care and possible harm.” from the report
  • Staffing levels

    serious

    The home did not always have enough staff, particularly at night, to support people safely and respond to emergencies.

    “The significant shortfalls we found indicated insufficient staffing levels to provide safe care and also respond to emergencies.” from the report
  • Out-of-date care plans

    serious

    Some care plans and risk assessments had not been reviewed after changes in people's needs or repeated accidents. One person receiving respite care had stayed for a year without a personalised care plan.

    “We found a number of care plans had not been reviewed in recent months.” from the report
  • Food and fluids

    serious

    The home did not always act when people lost weight or had low fluid intake. Inspectors also found limited food choices and that staff did not always offer choices.

    “People's nutritional and hydration needs were not always met to help them maintain a balanced diet and their health.” from the report
  • Limited activities

    minor

    Many people had little access to activities because only one activity coordinator was available each day, and the programme was not clearly displayed.

    “As a large home with nearly 90 people, we found the activities were out of reach for most people.” from the report
  • Weak management checks

    serious

    Audits had not found serious problems with medicines, staffing, care plans, nutrition or activities. This meant important risks were not dealt with promptly.

    “Audits and quality assurance systems had not identified that people were not always receiving and experiencing high quality care and achieving positive outcomes.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has changed in the way insulin and other medicines are given, recorded, stored and checked?
  2. 02How do you now assess and record staff competence before they administer insulin?
  3. 03How often are care plans and risk assessments reviewed, especially after falls, weight loss or changes in health?
  4. 04What staffing levels are guaranteed during the day and night, and how do you cover sickness and holidays?
  5. 05What activities are currently available, and how do you make sure people who stay in their rooms can take part?

This was an unannounced full inspection covering all five CQC questions, including infection prevention and control; it was the first inspection under the new provider. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 August 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Lodge Care Home

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. August 2022Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at The Lodge Care Home →

  2. October 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 8 October 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Havering

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 81 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Sidonia is a first class live-in carer whose dedication and thoughtfulness made her stay a happy experience.”
Martin B., about Sidonia M.
“Always on time and with a lovely smile for my mum. Theresa is kind and sensitive to my mum's needs.”
Anthea D., about Theresa L.
See live-in carers near HaveringProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.