Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at The Limes

Goodpublished 4 March 2025, 19 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2018

Rated Good overall, but inspectors found medicines and some safety checks needed improvement.

Inspectors visited without notice on 9 August 2018 and returned on 10 August. They observed care, spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care, medicines, risk and other records.

The home was rated Good overall. Effective, caring, responsive and well-led were rated Good. Safe was rated Requires Improvement because medicines were not always stored, recorded or given safely. Some care records and risk assessments also lacked enough detail.

People and relatives described kind, familiar staff and said people felt safe. The manager acted during and after the inspection on several issues, including medicine storage, medicine guidance, alarm mats and food choices.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and familiar staff

    People and relatives consistently described staff as caring, respectful and well known to the people they supported.

    “People and relatives were very complimentary and satisfied with the quality of care provided at the home.” from the report
  • Food and hydration support

    Staff understood nutritional risks and monitored people who were at risk of losing weight or not drinking enough.

    “There was a strong emphasis on people eating and drinking well.” from the report
  • Activities and interests

    People were offered activities and support to pursue hobbies and interests, including individual support for someone who chose not to join group activities.

    “The provider continued to be responsive to people's needs and people were occupied and stimulated with a variety of activities and events.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines were not consistently safe

    serious

    Some medicines were stored at unsafe temperatures. There were missing PRN instructions, incomplete patch records and problems using the electronic medicine system.

    “Systems to ensure safe management of medicines were not always followed in line with current guidance and the provider's own policies.” from the report
  • Some care plans lacked detail

    needs fixing

    Risk assessments and care plans did not always explain clearly how staff should respond to falls or reflect changes in people's abilities.

    “Although care records had not always been updated when people's abilities changed, staff knew people's needs.” from the report
  • Some call responses were delayed

    needs fixing

    Staff were usually available, but inspectors saw occasions when they were busy and could not respond immediately. One call bell was not answered during the four minutes it was observed.

    “However, staff were sometimes very busy and there were occasions when they were not able to respond immediately to requests for assistance.” from the report
  • Audits missed problems

    minor

    Quality checks did not identify several issues, and one medicine recording problem appeared in two audits without evidence of follow-up.

    “At this inspection we saw some detailed audits and checks to monitor the quality of the service.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to medicine storage, temperature checks and the electronic medicine recording system?
  2. 02How are PRN medicines and pain-relief patches now checked and recorded?
  3. 03How do you test alarm mats and other equipment to make sure they connect to the call alarm system?
  4. 04How are care plans updated when a person's mobility, continence or falls risk changes?
  5. 05How do you check that medicine and care-plan audits lead to timely action?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five questions, using observations, discussions and checks of care, medicine, risk and other records. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 September 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Limes

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. September 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Limes →

  2. June 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Outstanding

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. August 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 27 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warwickshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near WarwickshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.