Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at The Lawns Residential Care

Goodpublished 28 March 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that people were admitted safely, that testing was available for people and staff, and that the infection prevention and control policy was up to date.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2021

The Lawns Residential Care was inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control arrangements.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 11 December 2020. It focused on infection prevention and control during the coronavirus outbreak, rather than giving an overall rating.

Inspectors were assured that people were admitted safely, that testing was available for people and staff, and that the infection prevention and control policy was up to date.

The home had restricted visitors except in exceptional circumstances. It used a booking system, a separate visiting room, health screening, temperature checks and protective equipment. Staff had a separate entrance and changing area. People could keep in touch with relatives by phone and video calls.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe admissions

    Inspectors were assured that people were admitted safely to the home.

    “We were assured that the provider was admitting people safely to the service.” from the report
  • Testing arrangements

    Testing was available for people living in the home and for staff.

    “We were assured that the provider was accessing testing for people using the service and staff.” from the report
  • Visiting controls

    The home used a separate visiting room, booking limits, protective equipment and health checks for visitors.

    “A booking system which limited one visitor for 30 minutes had been implemented.” from the report
  • Contact with relatives

    People were supported to stay in contact with relatives by phone and video calls when visiting was restricted.

    “People were supported to keep in touch with their relatives through video and phone calls.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Approach still being developed

    minor

    Inspectors signposted the provider to resources to develop its infection prevention and control approach. The report does not explain what needed development.

    “We have also signposted the provider to resources to develop their approach.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to the infection prevention and control approach since inspectors signposted the home to further resources?
  2. 02How are new residents admitted safely now?
  3. 03How are people and staff tested, and how quickly are results acted on?
  4. 04What are the current visiting arrangements, including screening, protective equipment and limits on visitors?
  5. 05How will residents keep in touch with relatives if face-to-face visiting is restricted?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control practices during the coronavirus outbreak; it was inspected but not rated and did not provide a full service rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 January 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2020

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control arrangements during a targeted coronavirus visit.

Inspectors visited the home on 14 October 2020. This was an announced, targeted inspection during the coronavirus pandemic. It looked only at infection prevention and control measures.

Inspectors were assured that the home was managing visitors, social distancing, shielding, admissions, protective equipment, testing, cleaning and possible outbreaks. They also found that the infection control policy was up to date.

The home had separate entrances for visitors and staff. People could meet family and friends for short, socially distanced visits. Suites could be used to isolate people safely if needed.

The service was inspected but not rated. This means the visit did not give an overall quality rating or full ratings for the five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Safer entrances

    The home used a separate entrance for essential visitors so they could keep apart. Staff also had a separate entrance where they could change into and out of uniform.

    “An alternative entrance to the home had been put in place, to ensure essential visitors were able to maintain social distancing.” from the report
  • Safer family visits

    People could meet friends and relatives for short visits while keeping a safe distance.

    “People were supported to stay safe when they met their friends and/or family members by meeting socially distanced for a short period of time.” from the report
  • Isolation arrangements

    The home had self-contained suites that could be used to isolate people safely when needed.

    “The home had suites, which comprised of a bedroom, bathroom, lounge and kitchen area.” from the report
  • Infection control systems

    Inspectors were assured that the home had arrangements for protective equipment, testing, hygiene, admissions and managing outbreaks.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have your visitor and social distancing arrangements changed since the inspection on 14 October 2020?
  2. 02How do you currently manage testing for people living here and for staff?
  3. 03How would you isolate someone safely if they developed an infection?
  4. 04How do staff change into and out of uniform to reduce the risk of spreading infection?
  5. 05Can you show me the latest CQC report or ratings covering care, staffing, medicines and management?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures only; it did not rate the other areas of care. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Lawns Residential Care

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has slipped, from Outstanding to Good.

  1. January 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at The Lawns Residential Care →

  2. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at The Lawns Residential Care →

  3. March 2019Gooddown from Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2016Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: GoodWell-led: Outstanding

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. July 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 11 July 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Worcestershire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 85 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.

“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near WorcestershireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.