Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at The Grove Care Centre - Thurnscoe

Goodpublished 31 March 2026, 6 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2020

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention and control practice.

This was an announced inspection on 29 October 2020. It was part of a coronavirus pandemic review of infection prevention and control in care homes.

Inspectors found the premises clean and well maintained. Extra cleaning schedules had been introduced, hand sanitiser was available, and staff had recent infection control training.

Inspectors were assured that the home was managing visitors, distancing, admissions, personal protective equipment, testing and possible outbreaks safely.

No ratings were given. This report looked at infection prevention and control rather than providing a full rating of the home.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean premises

    Inspectors found the premises clean and well maintained. Extra cleaning schedules had been introduced during the pandemic.

    “Additional cleaning schedules had been introduced since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic.” from the report
  • Trained staff

    Staff had recent infection control training and inspectors saw them following the correct practice.

    “All staff had received recent training in infection control and prevention. Staff were seen to be following correct practice in this area.” from the report
  • Safe use of PPE

    Inspectors were assured that personal protective equipment was being used effectively and safely.

    “We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
  • Outbreak planning

    Inspectors were assured that the home had measures to prevent or manage infection outbreaks.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What are the current infection prevention and control arrangements?
  2. 02How are visitors currently managed to prevent infections spreading?
  3. 03How often are high-touch areas such as door handles and light switches cleaned?
  4. 04How are staff trained and checked on infection prevention and control?
  5. 05What information can you provide about the areas of care not covered by this inspection?

This was an announced thematic review of infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic; no ratings were awarded for the wider service. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2019

The Grove Care Centre - Thurnscoe was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with minor environmental improvements still needed.

This was an unannounced, planned comprehensive inspection on 20 May 2019. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and managers. They observed care, looked around the building and checked care records, medicines records, staff files and quality checks.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found people were protected from abuse, risks were managed, staffing was sufficient and medicines were handled safely.

People received personalised care from staff who knew them well. Staff were trained and supported, people were treated with kindness and dignity, and meals, activities, healthcare and complaints were managed well.

The report noted that some windows were misted and some carpets were worn. A few people also said they would like more activities. The home remained Good overall, as it had been at the previous inspection published on 2 December 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives said they felt safe, and inspectors found systems to identify abuse and manage risks.

    “People were safe and protected from avoidable harm. Legal requirements were met.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were observed being respectful, understanding and compassionate. People were involved in choices about their care and encouraged to remain independent.

    “We saw staff were respectful, understanding and compassionate.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans recorded people's needs, preferences, interests and histories. Staff knew people well and delivered care in an individual way.

    “People received personalised support from staff who knew them well.” from the report
  • Good management

    People, relatives and staff felt listened to and supported. The home used meetings, surveys and audits to review its service.

    “The registered manager has established an open and inclusive culture in the service” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some parts of the building needed improvement

    minor

    Inspectors found that some windows were misted, making the view unclear, and some carpets were worn. A refurbishment plan was being developed.

    “It was difficult to see through some windows as the panes were misted so obscuring the view through them and some carpets were a little worn.” from the report
  • Some people wanted more activities

    minor

    The home provided daily activities and had recently employed an activity co-ordinator. However, a few people said they would like more to do.

    “A few people said they would like more to do but could not say what these would be.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has been done about the misted windows and worn carpets since the inspection?
  2. 02What activities are available now, and how are they matched to each person's interests?
  3. 03How are care plans reviewed when a person's needs or preferences change?
  4. 04How many staff are normally on duty at different times, including weekends?
  5. 05How are families involved in care planning and end of life decisions?

This was an unannounced planned comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions, including the care provided and the premises. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 June 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Grove Care Centre - Thurnscoe

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2020Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at The Grove Care Centre - Thurnscoe →

  2. June 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Grove Care Centre - Thurnscoe →

  3. December 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 9 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 99 live-in carers within about an hour of Barnsley

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 82 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Ivy was very kind and gentle in all her dealings with my late mother. They got on very well and were able to share a joke and a laugh.”
Robert P., about Rumbidzai Ivy G.
See live-in carers near BarnsleyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.