Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at The Dean Neurological Centre

Goodpublished 17 July 2026, 2 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, but some records and communication needed improvement.

This was the first inspection since the service changed provider. Inspectors visited over four days, spoke with people, relatives, staff and professionals, and reviewed care records, medicines, recruitment and management records.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found safe staffing, safe medicines management, specialist healthcare support, kind care, activities and effective systems for handling concerns.

There were some areas to watch. Some paper care records had not been reviewed often enough and were out of date. Staff communication skills varied, and clearer guidance was needed for some rescue medicines when people were out in the community. The home took action during or after the inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing

    Managers planned staffing and used staff with the right skills, including for ventilator and tracheostomy care. Recruitment and induction checks were completed for permanent and agency staff.

    “Staff worked collaboratively and flexibly to ensure staff with the appropriate skills were always on duty.” from the report
  • Specialist support

    People's care was assessed by a range of clinicians and therapists. External specialists supported complex care, including ventilator, tracheostomy and end of life care.

    “A multidisciplinary team approach was taken when assessing people's needs so people's needs were assessed by several specialist clinicians and therapists working together.” from the report
  • Respect and choice

    People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff were observed seeking consent and respecting privacy, dignity and people's preferred ways of communicating.

    “People were supported to make decisions about their care and treatment.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to enjoy activities, develop friendships and spend time with others. Staff also provided one-to-one support to people at risk of isolation.

    “People were supported to be included in activities and interests which they enjoyed, and which met their preferences.” from the report
  • Leadership and improvement

    The home had regular audits and improvement plans. The new provider had invested in equipment, care records, laundry facilities, staffing systems and the sensory garden.

    “Regular checks and audits were completed to monitor the quality and safety of the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Care records needed updating

    needs fixing

    Some paper-based care records had not been reviewed as often as they should have been and no longer reflected people's current needs. The home said other arrangements meant this had not affected safety or care delivery.

    “A review of some of the paper-based care records still in use showed these had not been as frequently reviewed as they should have been.” from the report
  • Communication was not consistent

    needs fixing

    Inspectors saw respectful interactions, but staff communication skills varied. This led to different experiences for people, and some people had raised concerns about how staff spoke or interacted with them.

    “although staffs communication skills varied, which led to differing experiences for people.” from the report
  • Rescue medicine guidance

    needs fixing

    During the inspection, the home acted to provide clearer instructions for staff about some prescribed rescue medicines when people were out in the community.

    “During the inspection immediate action was taken to provide clearer guidance for staff on the use of some prescribed rescue medicines.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have all care records now been moved to the electronic system and updated to reflect each person's current needs?
  2. 02How can relatives or legal representatives see relevant care records after the move from paper records?
  3. 03What training and monitoring are now in place to make staff communication more consistent?
  4. 04What are the instructions for each person's rescue medicines when they are out in the community?
  5. 05How are staffing levels and specialist skills maintained for people needing ventilator or tracheostomy care?

This was an announced inspection covering all five key questions, including infection prevention and control under Safe. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Dean Neurological Centre

7 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. October 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Dean Neurological Centre →

  2. December 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated
  3. February 2020Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  4. July 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
  5. July 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  6. September 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  7. February 2017Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  8. December 2014Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  9. July 2022

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 July 2022.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

38 live-in carers within about an hour of Gloucestershire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,030 to £1,360 a week. 31 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near GloucestershireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.