Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at The Angela Grace Care Centre

Goodpublished 8 June 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control, including protective equipment, testing, cleaning, safe admissions and visiting arrangements. The provider also said it had measures to manage COVID-19-related staffing pressures.
Effective?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention and control practices during a COVID-19-focused visit.

Inspectors made an unannounced visit on 02 March 2022. This was a targeted inspection because the home had a COVID-19 outbreak. They looked mainly at infection prevention and control, and asked about staffing pressures.

Inspectors found staff had infection control training and checks of their skills. The home had screening and testing arrangements, cleaning schedules, risk assessments and systems for managing outbreaks.

Inspectors said they were assured that the home was using protective equipment safely, supporting safe admissions and visits, and following infection control guidance. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Staff infection control training

    Staff had infection prevention and control training, with their skills checked for putting on and removing protective equipment and for hand hygiene.

    “All staff received infection prevention and control (IPC) training and had their competencies assessed regarding donning and doffing and hand hygiene.” from the report
  • Management checks

    The registered manager carried out regular infection control audits, and managers completed spot checks to make sure procedures were followed.

    “The registered manager completed regular IPC audits to maintain oversight and ensure correct procedures were in place and being completed.” from the report
  • Clean surroundings

    Inspectors found cleaning schedules for all areas. The home appeared clean and there were no odours.

    “Cleaning schedules were in place for all areas of the home. The home appeared clean with no odours.” from the report
  • Managing COVID-19 risks

    The home screened and tested people, staff and visitors. It supported people to self-isolate and changed staff arrangements during an outbreak.

    “There were systems and processes in place to ensure people, staff and visitors were screened and tested for COVID-19 regularly to reduce the spread of COVID-19.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are you currently managing staffing pressures linked to COVID-19, and has this affected people's care?
  2. 02What infection prevention and control training and competency checks have staff completed recently?
  3. 03How would I be able to visit if there were another COVID-19 outbreak?
  4. 04How often are infection prevention and control audits and management spot checks carried out now?
  5. 05How are people supported to keep in touch with relatives if visits have to be limited?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated and the other areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control arrangements during a targeted COVID-19 visit.

Inspectors visited the home without notice on 23 March 2021. This was a targeted inspection focused on infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They found the home was clean and tidy. Staff had enough protective equipment and used it correctly. There were arrangements for testing, safe admissions, visitors, social distancing and managing possible outbreaks.

The home was inspected but not rated. This means the visit did not provide an overall quality rating or ratings for all five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean environment

    The home was clean and tidy, with regular cleaning that included areas people touched often.

    “The service was clean and tidy. Regular cleaning took place throughout the service including touchpoint areas.” from the report
  • Protective equipment

    Staff had enough masks, gloves, aprons and hand sanitiser. Inspectors saw staff using protective equipment correctly.

    “Staff had access to sufficient supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) including masks, gloves, aprons and hand sanitiser.” from the report
  • Safe admissions

    People moving into the home had to have a negative COVID-19 test and complete a 14-day isolation period.

    “Suitable arrangements were in place to ensure that anyone moving into the service, did so safely.” from the report
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors had safety checks, including rapid testing, temperature checks, hand sanitising, protective equipment and a questionnaire.

    “Safe arrangements were in place for visitors to the service including health professionals and relatives when it was safe to do so.” from the report
  • Regular oversight

    The home completed infection control checks and audits so that issues could be identified and addressed promptly.

    “Regular checks and audits around infection control were completed to ensure the registered manager had oversight of the service and could address any issues promptly if found.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are you currently testing residents and staff for COVID-19?
  2. 02What are your current rules for relatives visiting, including testing, protective equipment and health checks?
  3. 03How do you safely admit someone new, including testing and isolation?
  4. 04How often are infection control checks and audits completed, and what happens when they identify an issue?
  5. 05What are the current ratings and findings for care areas that this targeted inspection did not cover?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the service was inspected but not rated overall or across all five questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 1 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Angela Grace Care Centre

3 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at The Angela Grace Care Centre →

  2. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at The Angela Grace Care Centre →

  3. June 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. November 2014

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 November 2014.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of West Northamptonshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,280 a week. 87 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
Bridget S., about Nyarai N.
“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
See live-in carers near West NorthamptonshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.