Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Stockmoor Lodge

Goodpublished 31 October 2020, 5 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors looked at infection control, visiting and staffing pressures. They were assured that infection risks were managed, but did not review the whole Safe question.
Effective?
Good
This question was not reviewed during this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This question was not reviewed during this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Requires improvement
This question was not reviewed during this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not reviewed during this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control and visiting arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and staffing pressures. Inspectors visited on 30 January 2022, although the report also gives the inspection visit date as 31 January 2022.

The home had procedures for testing, vaccinations, hand hygiene and personal protective equipment. Inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed, including during COVID-19 outbreaks.

There were staff vacancies, but shifts were covered by existing staff, managers or agency workers. The home was inspected but not rated because only part of the Safe question was reviewed. Its previous Safe rating was Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    The home had testing, hand hygiene and personal protective equipment arrangements. Staff received infection control and COVID-19 training, and managers monitored PPE use.

    “We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
  • Visiting arrangements

    The home followed current visiting guidance and kept essential caregivers informed. Extra measures were used during COVID-19 outbreaks.

    “The provider had a visiting policy in place, in line with current guidance.” from the report
  • Staffing cover

    Although there were staff vacancies, shifts were covered by the staff team, managers or agency workers. The same agency workers were used when possible.

    “There were staff vacancies but shifts were either covered by the staff team, the management team or agency workers.” from the report
  • Layout and supplies

    The home was divided into six smaller units, with enough space to support social distancing. Inspectors also found plentiful PPE and testing equipment.

    “The accommodation was spacious which enabled social distancing to be maintained within communal areas.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staff vacancies

    minor

    The home had staff vacancies. Shifts were covered at the time of inspection, but families should ask whether vacancies and extra shifts remain an issue.

    “The service had a number of staff vacancies but had remained well staffed throughout the pandemic.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many staff vacancies do you have now, and how are shifts being covered?
  2. 02What are the current rules for family visits, including visits during an outbreak?
  3. 03How often are people, staff and essential caregivers tested for COVID-19 now?
  4. 04How do you check that staff are using PPE and following hand hygiene procedures?
  5. 05Which current CQC ratings cover the questions that were not reviewed in this inspection?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and staffing pressures; only part of Safe was reviewed and the other questions were not inspected. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2020

Stockmoor Lodge is rated Good overall; inspectors found strong infection control arrangements, but Safe was inspected and not rated.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 06 October 2020. It looked at infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic, rather than reviewing the whole service.

Inspectors found good systems for reducing infection risks. These included testing, isolating new admissions, separating the home into units, staff training, hand-washing checks and plans for possible outbreaks.

Visitors had safety measures including signing in, temperature checks, hand washing and personal protective equipment. The overall service rating was Good, but this inspection did not review all areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection risk planning

    The home had risk assessments, staff training and contingency plans to help prevent and manage infections.

    “The service had a comprehensive risk assessment in place and had developed plans to reduce risks.” from the report
  • Safe admissions

    New residents had to test negative for Covid-19 and were isolated for a further two weeks.

    “People were not admitted to the service unless they tested negative for Covid-19; there were procedures in place to isolate new admissions for a further two weeks” from the report
  • Testing and protective equipment

    The home arranged regular testing for residents and staff. Inspectors found that staff understood how to reduce infection risks and used protective equipment safely.

    “The registered manager facilitated regular testing was for both staff and people living at the service.” from the report
  • Safer visiting

    Visitors signed in, had their temperatures taken, washed their hands and were given personal protective equipment. Their movement around the home was kept to a minimum.

    “All visitors to the service were required to sign in, have their temperatures taken and wash their hands.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are residents and staff tested for infections now?
  2. 02How do you isolate new residents when they first arrive?
  3. 03How do you manage visits, including visits for people approaching the end of their lives?
  4. 04What happens if there is a suspected infection outbreak in one of the six units?
  5. 05How do you check that staff are following hand-washing and other infection control procedures?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control as part of a coronavirus thematic review; the full Safe question and other areas of care were not reviewed. This explanation was written from the published report of 31 October 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Stockmoor Lodge

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Stockmoor Lodge →

  2. October 2020Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Stockmoor Lodge →

  3. June 2018Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2017

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 March 2017.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

76 live-in carers within about two hours of Somerset

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,330 a week. 62 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She looked after my mum, who can be incredibly challenging, so well and so gently, and we always felt confident that my mum was getting the best care available.”
Holly C., about Dace L.
“She was not phased by anything, she was adaptable, kind & gave us complete confidence to go away & not worry about a thing!”
Karen C., about Mandy E.
See live-in carers near SomersetProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.