Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Station View

Goodpublished 4 May 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, effective safeguarding, regular risk reviews and safe medicine management. Infection control, fire safety and visiting arrangements were also satisfactory.
Effective?
Good
This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
Caring?
Good
This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found detailed audits, action plans and systems for gathering feedback and improving the service. The rating improved from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found people felt safe, medicines were managed well, and leadership had improved.

This was an unannounced inspection on 29 March 2023. One inspector and an Expert by Experience spoke with 5 people, 4 relatives, 2 care staff and managers. They also checked care records, medicine records, recruitment files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, suitable risk assessments and effective safeguarding arrangements. Medicines were stored, given and recorded safely. Infection control, fire safety and cleaning arrangements were also in place.

The home had improved its medicine storage records since the last inspection. Its Well-led rating improved from Requires Improvement to Good. The overall rating was Good, but the other three question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's individual needs. Recruitment checks were robust and aimed to ensure suitable staff were employed.

    “There were enough staff to meet people's individual needs and maintain their safety.” from the report
  • Medicines

    Medicines were stored, administered and recorded safely. The home had improved its medicine storage records since the previous inspection.

    “Medicine records were person centred and accurately completed.” from the report
  • Infection control

    The home used suitable cleaning, hygiene and protective equipment arrangements. These checks and cleaning activities were recorded.

    “Additional cleaning of all areas and frequent touch surfaces was in place and recorded regularly by staff.” from the report
  • Management and improvement

    The manager used feedback, audits and action plans to monitor quality and make improvements. The Well-led rating improved to Good.

    “The registered manager carried out audits that included action plans for improvement where needed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you continue to check that medicines are stored safely and that records remain complete?
  2. 02How are people's individual risks reviewed after accidents or incidents?
  3. 03How do you make sure there are enough staff to meet each person's needs every day?
  4. 04How do you collect and act on feedback from residents and relatives?
  5. 05What were the previous ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive, and when will these areas next be reviewed?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection control; the Effective, Caring and Responsive ratings were not inspected and carried over from 27 November 2020. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 May 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2020

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention and control arrangements.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 5 November 2020. It followed concerns about infection control and prevention measures.

Inspectors looked only at infection prevention and control under the Safe question. They found appropriate use of protective equipment, visitor checks, cleaning, staff training and arrangements for social distancing and shielding.

The home was rated “Inspected but not rated”. This means the visit gave assurance about infection control, but it was not a full inspection and did not provide an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Family communication

    Staff used several ways to keep relatives informed and help residents communicate while face coverings and visiting restrictions were in place.

    “The provider and staff kept family members up to date about the latest guidance and their relative's health via regular telephone calls, letters and other technology including face time and handheld radios for window visits.” from the report
  • Cleaning and training

    Extra cleaning was carried out and recorded, including cleaning in bedrooms where people were isolating. All staff groups had infection-control training.

    “Additional cleaning of all areas and frequent touch surfaces was in place and being carried out and recorded by housekeeping staff.” from the report
  • Communication and oversight

    The home had systems for giving staff consistent updates about infection-control policies and practices.

    “There was a robust communication system on place to ensure staff received consistent updates in relation to infection control policy and practice.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Are the PPE supplies, visitor checks and temperature checks described in the report still in place?
  2. 02How are cleaning of frequently touched surfaces and bedrooms for people isolating recorded now?
  3. 03How will you keep our relative and family updated if visiting arrangements or infection-control guidance changes?
  4. 04What infection-prevention training have staff completed since this inspection?
  5. 05What are the home's current ratings for Caring, Responsive, Effective and Well-led, which were not assessed in this visit?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control under Safe only; the other key questions and an overall rating were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Station View

3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. May 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Station View →

  2. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Station View →

  3. May 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

28 live-in carers within about an hour of North Yorkshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,010 to £1,290 a week. 27 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“She was always 'just present enough': attentive, available, kind and engaging, but without ever over-stepping any boundary”
Beatrice N., about Rosemary H.
See live-in carers near North YorkshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.