Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Stallingborough Lodge Care Home Ltd

Goodpublished 13 November 2021, 4 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Inspectors found safe staffing and recruitment, timely medicines, suitable risk checks and effective infection prevention measures.
Effective?
Good
People's needs were assessed and reviewed, and staff had training and supervision. People received suitable food, drinks and healthcare support, and consent and best-interest decisions were recorded.
Caring?
Good
People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. They were involved in decisions, supported to make choices and encouraged to remain independent.
Responsive?
Good
Care records were detailed and up to date. Activities reflected people's interests, contact with relatives was supported, and complaints were acknowledged and answered promptly.
Well-led?
Good
Managers monitored the quality of care and promoted an open, positive culture. The home consulted people, relatives and staff and worked with healthcare professionals.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2021

Stallingborough Lodge Care Home was rated Good in every area; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care.

Inspectors visited without notice on 14 September 2021 and 23 September 2021. They reviewed care records, risk assessments, staff recruitment and training records, and management documents. They spoke with staff and managers, observed care, and gathered feedback from people, relatives and healthcare professionals.

The home was rated Good overall and Good for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough suitably recruited staff, safe medicines processes, clean premises and effective infection control. People said they felt safe and well cared for.

People's care was personalised. Staff supported people's choices, dignity, independence, meals, activities and contact with relatives. Inspectors also found that managers monitored quality, worked well with outside professionals and responded to complaints in a timely way.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines support

    Inspectors found that medicines were given on time by trained staff. Regular checks were used to identify concerns or errors.

    “People received their medicines on time from trained staff.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    People were listened to and treated with dignity. Staff knew people's choices and preferences and supported their independence.

    “People were respected, listened to and well cared for.” from the report
  • Personalised activities

    Activities were based on people's interests. People who did not want group activities could spend one-to-one time with staff doing something they chose.

    “Activities were varied and planned based on people's interests.” from the report
  • Positive management

    The managers monitored the service and encouraged an open culture. People, relatives and staff were regularly asked for their views.

    “The registered manager and provider monitored the quality of the service regularly to make sure they continued to deliver a high quality standard of care and drive improvements.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you assess and update my relative's care plan after they move in?
  2. 02How will you manage my relative's medicines, including any medicines needed as and when required?
  3. 03What activities are available for someone with my relative's interests, and what one-to-one support is offered?
  4. 04How will you support my relative's dietary, communication and healthcare needs?
  5. 05How can I raise a concern or complaint, and how will you keep me informed of the response?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five key questions, including specific checks on infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 November 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2019

Stallingborough Lodge Care Home was rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe and personalised care, with only a minor issue about collecting relatives' feedback.

This was a scheduled inspection on 24 and 25 January 2019. One inspector visited, with support from an expert in dementia care on the first day. The first day was unannounced.

Inspectors spoke with people living there, relatives and staff. They observed care and reviewed care plans, medicine records, recruitment files, training records and management checks. They found people were safe, treated with kindness and supported to make choices.

The home provided activities, community visits and accessible information. Staff were trained and knew people's needs. The overall rating was Good, and all five areas were also rated Good. The previous inspection had also rated the service Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives described staff as kind and approachable. Inspectors observed compassionate, respectful care and staff taking time to understand people's preferences.

    “We observed how staff supported people with dignity and respect and provided compassionate support in an individualised way.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Staff knew people's likes, dislikes and communication methods. People were supported to make choices and remain as independent as possible.

    “Staff knew people's likes, dislikes and preferences. They used this detail to care for people in the way they wanted.” from the report
  • Good activities and community links

    People could join activities based on their interests, including visits into the local community and events involving relatives.

    “Activities enabled people to maintain friendships within their local community, attending coffee mornings, tai chi sessions and visiting local shops, hairdresser and the local pub.” from the report
  • Safe and clean environment

    Inspectors found that the environment and equipment were assessed for safety. The home was clean and included signs and accessible areas for people living with dementia.

    “The environment and equipment used had been assessed for safety.” from the report
  • Skilled staff

    Staff had an induction, training and opportunities for supervision and appraisal. Inspectors found them competent and knowledgeable.

    “Staff were competent, knowledgeable and skilled; and carried out their roles effectively.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Relatives' feedback records

    minor

    Inspectors said the records showing feedback from relatives could be better. The nominated individual agreed to review surveys and other ways of hearing from people who did not complete them or attend meetings.

    “The record relating to feedback from relatives could be improved further.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now collect and record feedback from relatives who do not complete surveys or attend meetings?
  2. 02How do you decide whether staffing levels are enough when a resident's needs change?
  3. 03What happens when a medicine error is found, and how do you check that action has been taken?
  4. 04How will you make sure activities continue to reflect each resident's interests and preferences?
  5. 05How are care plans reviewed when there are changes in a resident's health or support needs?

This was a scheduled inspection of the care home, including both the premises and the care provided, and it considered all five CQC questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 February 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Stallingborough Lodge Care Home Ltd

3 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2021Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Stallingborough Lodge Care Home Ltd →

  2. February 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Stallingborough Lodge Care Home Ltd →

  3. August 2016Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. March 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

12 live-in carers within about an hour of North East Lincolnshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,350 a week. 10 can care for a couple. 7 years' experience on average.

“What truly stands out is how mindful and attentive she is to all of my medical needs, always going above and beyond to ensure I’m comfortable and well cared for.”
Lucy K., about Emma H.
“Martin was more than a carer, he managed the home and became my uncle's best friend, enriching his life during his last few years.”
Julie V., about Martin G.
See live-in carers near North East LincolnshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.