Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at St James's Lodge

Requires improvementpublished 30 December 2025, 9 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the home was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2021

St James's Lodge was inspected but not rated; inspectors found mostly good infection control but identified a problem with masks being worn on entry.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 27 January 2021. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found good social distancing, safe arrangements for new admissions and testing, and support for people to keep in touch with family. People at the end of life could have family visits with testing, checks and protective equipment.

Inspectors were somewhat assured about the use of protective equipment because staff did not put on their masks until they reached the staff room. The provider said this was addressed immediately. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give a quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Social distancing

    Staff and residents were observed following social distancing arrangements. Staff gave people dedicated support so they were not left lonely.

    “People were supported to social distance and had dedicated support from staff to ensure they were not then lonely.” from the report
  • Admissions and testing

    New residents had a negative COVID test before admission, were isolated for 14 days and were tested again soon after arriving.

    “People admitted to the service had a confirmed negative Covid test 24 hours before admission.” from the report
  • Family contact

    People could contact family virtually, and people at the end of life could receive family visits with safety checks and protective equipment.

    “People at their end of life were able to have visits from their family” from the report
  • Ongoing checks

    The provider and registered manager carried out regular checks on infection control standards.

    “The provider and registered manager were undertaking regular checks to ensure good standards of infection control were maintained.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Masks on entry

    needs fixing

    At the start of shifts, staff walked into the home to collect their fitted masks instead of wearing a mask on entry. Inspectors said this did not follow national guidance, although the provider said it had taken immediate action.

    “They were going to the staff room to pick up their personally fitted mask then changing into their uniforms.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now make sure every staff member puts on a mask before entering the home?
  2. 02How do you check that the change to the mask procedure is being followed consistently?
  3. 03What testing and isolation arrangements do you currently use for people admitted to the home?
  4. 04How can residents keep in touch with family, and what arrangements are available for end-of-life visits?

This was a targeted, unannounced inspection of infection prevention and control measures during the coronavirus pandemic, and the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 February 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2018

St James's Lodge was rated Good in all areas; inspectors found kind, safe care, with some records and end-of-life planning needing improvement.

This was an unannounced, scheduled comprehensive inspection on 25 and 26 October 2018. Inspectors reviewed care records, medicines, accidents, complaints, audits and staff files. They spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff, student nurses and health professionals.

The home was rated Good overall and Good for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People and relatives said they felt safe and that staff were kind, respectful and approachable. Inspectors saw person-centred care, good support with health needs, suitable staffing and positive links with other professionals.

Inspectors found some gaps in records. These included staff employment histories, training records, significant events, people's social needs and end-of-life wishes. The provider introduced or planned new recording and checking systems, and was asked to review equality, diversity and human rights training and accessible information.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives consistently described staff as kind, friendly and respectful. Inspectors observed warm greetings and spontaneous kindness.

    “Everyone we spoke with told us St James's was a lovely place to live and visit, that staff were kind and caring and people were treated with respect.” from the report
  • Personal choice and independence

    People were supported to choose where they spent time, who they spent it with and which activities they wanted. Staff also helped people maintain family and community links.

    “People were involved in their day to day lives through being empowered to make their own choices about where they spent their time, who with and how.” from the report
  • Good health support

    The home worked with GPs and other health professionals to manage people's health needs. Inspectors found that changes in weight and swallowing were identified quickly.

    “People's health was well managed and staff had positive links with professionals which promoted wellbeing for them.” from the report
  • Safe medicines practice

    Medicines were administered as prescribed, recorded and audited. People said they received their medicines regularly and on time.

    “Medicines were given as administered as prescribed and recorded in line with current guidance.” from the report
  • Good leadership and listening

    People, relatives and staff said managers were approachable and listened to concerns and ideas. The home used feedback and audits to improve its work.

    “All feedback was used to make continuous improvements to the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staff file checks

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found a gap in checking the full employment history of prospective staff. The provider said it had changed its filing and auditing system.

    “However, we observed there was a gap in exploring all prospective staff's employment history.” from the report
  • Gaps in training records

    needs fixing

    Staff training was being updated, but the records were incomplete. Inspectors gave the provider more time to complete them.

    “Training was updated at the provider's required intervals however the records had gaps in them.” from the report
  • Incomplete event records

    needs fixing

    Some significant events were not fully recorded, and observations did not always show the normal range or what action was taken. The home introduced a new recording form.

    “We identified that not all significant events for people were fully recorded.” from the report
  • End-of-life planning

    needs fixing

    Care records focused mainly on clinical needs and did not fully record people's end-of-life wishes and feelings. Some Treatment and Escalation Plans were not completed in line with current guidance.

    “People's care records focused on the clinical aspects of people's care but did not reflect the person's wishes and feelings at their end of life.” from the report
  • Accessible information and diversity

    minor

    The home did not have an identified strategy for meeting the Accessible Information Standards. Inspectors also recommended reviewing the Statement of Purpose and training on equality, diversity and human rights.

    “The staff instinctively met people's communication needs but there was no identified strategy in ensuring they were meeting the Accessible information standards” from the report
  • Waiting when staff are busy

    minor

    People generally felt there were enough staff, but some said they sometimes waited longer when staff were busy, depending on the time of day.

    “People commented that when staff were really busy was the only time they had to wait longer.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have all staff personnel files now been audited for complete employment histories, and how are future gaps identified?
  2. 02Have the gaps in training records been completed and independently checked?
  3. 03How are significant events, including changes in observations and accidents, now recorded and reviewed?
  4. 04How will you record each person's end-of-life wishes and feelings?
  5. 05How are Treatment and Escalation Plans checked to ensure they reflect each person's current situation?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions and both the premises and the care provided; all five ratings were given as Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 December 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of St James's Lodge

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at St James's Lodge →

  2. December 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at St James's Lodge →

  3. May 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

9 live-in carers within about an hour of Plymouth

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

8 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.

See live-in carers near PlymouthProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.