Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at St Georges House

Goodpublished 28 June 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People had tailored risk assessments and there were enough staff to support people safely. Inspectors also found that medicines were administered as prescribed and infection-control arrangements were effective.
Effective?
Good
People's needs were assessed before moving in, staff were trained and supervised, and people were supported with food, healthcare and healthy lifestyles. Inspectors noted that dietary information was not displayed in the kitchen, although action was taken.
Caring?
Good
Inspectors found kind and respectful support that promoted privacy, dignity, independence and choice. People and families were involved in decisions about care.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were personalised and staff knew people's preferences and communication methods. Inspectors found that the steps for achieving goals were not always recorded, and the manager acted on this during the inspection.
Well-led?
Good
The manager and staff created a positive culture and used audits, feedback and action plans to improve the home. A new electronic care-planning system was being introduced.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2023

St Georges House was rated Good; inspectors found safe, caring and personalised support, with some care-planning records needing more detail.

This was the first inspection of the newly registered home. Inspectors visited on 5 and 8 June 2023, and inspection activity continued until 20 June. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and reviewed care, medicine, recruitment and management records.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, suitable risk assessments, safe medicine systems, trained staff and respectful, person-centred care.

There were some record-keeping gaps. Plans did not always explain the steps needed to achieve people's goals, and dietary information was not displayed in the kitchen. The home took action during the inspection to address these points.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough, skilled staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's care and social needs. Staff had specialist training, regular supervision and knew the people living at the home well.

    “There were enough staff to support people with their care and social needs safely.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff promoted privacy, dignity, independence and choice. People were supported to develop skills and take part in activities they enjoyed.

    “Staff were passionate and motivated to provide safe person-centred care.” from the report
  • Safe medicines support

    Medicines were given as prescribed, with detailed plans for regular and as-needed medicines. The home reviewed medicine incidents and carried out medicine audits.

    “Medicines care plans and risk assessments were detailed, and person centred.” from the report
  • Positive management

    The home used audits, feedback and action plans to identify shortfalls and improve care. Staff said they felt supported and could ask for more training.

    “A quality assurance system was in place which was used to identify and address shortfalls of the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Goals were not always fully recorded

    needs fixing

    Care plans recorded people's goals, but did not always explain the steps needed to achieve them. The manager took action during the inspection.

    “However, the steps planned to achieve goals were not consistently documented.” from the report
  • Dietary information was not in the kitchen

    minor

    People's dietary needs were recorded in care plans, but this information was not displayed in the kitchen. The manager said a copy would be placed there to reduce risk.

    “People's dietary information was not evident in the kitchen, however there had been no negative impact resulting from this.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have the care plans been updated so that every goal includes clear steps and planning?
  2. 02Where is people's dietary information now displayed, and how do you make sure new staff see it?
  3. 03How is the new electronic care-planning system being used, and how quickly are updates available to staff?
  4. 04How often are medicines audited, and how are any errors or lessons shared with staff?
  5. 05How will you involve my relative and our family in future care reviews and decisions?

This was the first comprehensive inspection of the newly registered home and covered all five CQC key questions, each of which was rated Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 June 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of St Georges House

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. June 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at St Georges House →

  2. November 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 18 November 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

88 live-in carers within about an hour of Bedford

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 76 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
Bridget S., about Nyarai N.
“She handled the new situation in front of her with such professionalism and I felt I could trust her 100%.”
Siobhan D., about Sithabile Tabile M.
See live-in carers near BedfordProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.