CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at St Anne's Home - London
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People told inspectors they felt safe. There were enough staff, risk assessments were in place, medicines were managed safely and infection control arrangements were suitable.
- Effective?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found clearer roles, improved quality monitoring and a positive culture. People, relatives and staff spoke positively about the management.
What inspectors found, April 2023
St Anne's Home - London is rated Good; inspectors found safe care and stronger management, with one medicines communication issue still being addressed.
The inspection was unannounced and took place on 24 February, 28 February and 10 March 2023. One inspector observed care, spoke with people, a relative and staff, and checked care, medicines, risk, recruitment and management records.
The home was rated Good overall. Safe and Well-led were both rated Good. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, improved medicines management, suitable infection control and systems for learning from accidents and incidents.
The home had previously been rated Requires Improvement in December 2019 and was in breach of a regulation. Inspectors found that improvements had been made and the home was no longer in breach.
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led. The other three ratings were carried over from the previous inspection, so they were not reassessed during this visit.
Safer medicines
Medicines systems had improved since the previous inspection. Staff were trained and checked as competent, and inspectors found assurance that medicines were given safely and as prescribed.
“We checked 6 people's medicines including controlled drugs and found a level of assurance that people received their medicines safely, consistently and as prescribed.” from the report
Enough staff
Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. People did not have to wait long for assistance, and recruitment checks were completed.
“There were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs. People, a relative and records confirmed this.” from the report
People felt safe
People said they felt safe, and staff understood how to report suspected abuse. Risk assessments covered issues such as falls, mobility and skin integrity.
“People told us they felt safe at the service.” from the report
Improved oversight
The provider had improved its quality monitoring and auditing. A dedicated clinical lead and pharmacist checks supported safer medicines management.
“At this inspection, the provider had made improvements.” from the report
Kind and respectful culture
People and relatives spoke positively about staff and managers. Inspectors found the culture open, inclusive and respectful.
“People spoke positively about the staff and managers at the service.” from the report
Medicine changes
needs fixingOne of five recommendations from a pharmacist check was still ongoing. It concerned keeping communication about medicine changes effective.
“Four out of the five recommendations had been completed and one was ongoing in relation to maintaining effective communication about medicine changes.” from the report
Fire training updates
minorInspectors found some slippage in staff fire-training updates. The training officer had addressed this, but families may wish to ask how it is kept up to date.
“It was noted although all staff had received fire training there had been some slippage on updates.” from the report
- 01How are you completing and checking the remaining action about communication when medicines are changed?
- 02How often are staff fire-training updates completed, and how do you check that no updates are missed?
- 03What were the results of the recent satisfaction survey, and what improvements will follow from it?
- 04How will you continue the medicine checks introduced since the previous inspection?
- 05Can you explain which ratings were carried over because they were not assessed during this inspection?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection prevention and control under Safe; the Effective, Caring and Responsive ratings were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 April 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, August 2020
Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control measures during the coronavirus pandemic.
The inspection took place on 6 August 2020. It was an announced, targeted inspection focused only on infection prevention and control in response to coronavirus.
Inspectors found good practice at the home. Visitors had to sign in, use hand sanitiser and wear protective equipment. Visiting was limited to one person at a booked time, and the home took part in NHS Test and Trace.
Inspectors said they were assured about infection control, including protective equipment, testing, safe admissions, social distancing, hygiene and managing possible outbreaks. The home was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.
Visitor infection checks
Infection control checks started when visitors entered the home. Visitors had to sign in, use hand sanitiser and wear a mask and gloves.
“Infection control was monitored as soon as you entered the service.” from the report
Controlled visiting
The home limited visits to one person at a time and required visitors to book a time slot.
“The service had a strict visiting policy to reduce the spread of the virus.” from the report
Protective equipment and testing
Inspectors were assured that protective equipment was used safely and that testing was available for residents and staff.
“We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01What infection control and protective equipment arrangements are in place now?
- 02How are visitors currently booked, checked and recorded when they arrive?
- 03How do you test residents and staff when infection is suspected or there is an outbreak?
- 04How do you manage new admissions safely?
- 05What arrangements are in place to prevent or manage an infection outbreak?
This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic; it was not a full inspection and the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 August 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of St Anne's Home - London
5 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- April 2023Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- August 2020Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- December 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2018Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: Good
- October 2016GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- August 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 November 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Hackney
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 76 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“Sidonia is a first class live-in carer whose dedication and thoughtfulness made her stay a happy experience.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.