Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Southdowns Nursing Home

Goodpublished 12 November 2024, 22 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2023

Southdowns Nursing Home was rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks and record-keeping were not always managed safely.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 29 June, 03 July and 04 July 2023. One inspector reviewed records, medicines, recruitment checks and the building. They observed communal areas and spoke with people, staff, visitors, relatives and health professionals.

The home was not always safe. Wound care, unexplained injuries, changes in behaviour and staff deployment were not managed consistently. Some people had to wait for help, and one communal area was left without staff presence, drinks or a call bell for part of the inspection.

The home was also not always well-led. Audits did not find important risks, and care records did not always contain complete information. The provider made some changes during the inspection, including new systems for recording injuries and reviewing wound care.

The overall rating changed from Good at the previous inspection to Requires Improvement. The inspection looked only at Safe and Well-led. The other question ratings were carried over from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Safeguarding

    Staff understood how to recognise and report abuse. Inspectors found that safeguarding referrals were made when needed.

    “People were protected from risk of abuse by organisational systems and processes.” from the report
  • Medicines

    Medicines were stored, given and disposed of safely. Staff who administered medicines had the required knowledge, training and competency.

    “Medicines were stored, administered, and disposed of safely.” from the report
  • Suitable recruitment

    The home completed recruitment checks before staff started work, including criminal record checks and checks on nurses' registration.

    “Recruitment checks were carried out before staff started work at Southdowns Nursing Home.” from the report
  • Working with professionals

    Staff worked with health and care professionals, including therapists and community teams, to support people's needs.

    “They contact us in a timely way and work with us.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Wound care and injury risks

    serious

    Wounds were not always assessed or recorded fully, and staff did not always follow recommended guidance. Injuries and unexplained bruising were not consistently investigated to prevent them happening again.

    “The impact of these shortfalls meant people were at risk of wound deterioration.” from the report
  • Incomplete care records

    serious

    Records did not always explain changes in people's health, behaviour or care needs. This meant staff, including new or agency staff, might not have the information needed to provide safe care.

    “There was a lack of clear and accurate records regarding some people's care and support.” from the report
  • Staff deployment

    needs fixing

    Although staffing numbers were considered appropriate overall, staff were not always positioned where people needed them. This led to delays and left one communal area without adequate support during the inspection.

    “There was a lack of staff presence in the first-floor communal area between 11 am and 11 40 am.” from the report
  • Personal care

    needs fixing

    People were not always offered showers or oral and personal care consistently. Records did not always show whether care had been attempted or why it could not be provided.

    “Oral health care support and personal care was not being given consistently.” from the report
  • Infection control practice

    needs fixing

    The home was visually clean, but there were unpleasant odours in some areas. Staff were not always following good practice for gloves and moving soiled linen.

    “It was identified during the site visit that staff were not following good practice guidance regarding gloves and transporting soiled linen.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to wound assessments and treatment records since the inspection?
  2. 02How are unexplained bruises, skin tears and other incidents now investigated and reviewed for patterns?
  3. 03How do you make sure staff are present in communal areas and that people can get drinks and use a call bell?
  4. 04How are care records updated when someone's behaviour, health or personal care needs change?
  5. 05Who is currently responsible for managing the home, and how are leadership and quality checks being overseen while there is no registered manager?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other ratings were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 25 July 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control at Southdowns Nursing Home.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 12 February 2021. It focused on infection prevention and control because the home had experienced a coronavirus outbreak.

Inspectors found that the home had systems for isolating people, reducing infection risks, cleaning, using protective equipment and carrying out testing. They were assured that the provider was meeting the infection control measures they checked.

The home was closed to most visitors at the time, except for people visiting someone receiving palliative or end of life care. Families could keep in touch through phone and video calls, and a separate visiting room with a large window had been built.

The service was inspected but not rated. This report does not give ratings for the other four areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control planning

    The home used bedroom isolation and zoning to reduce the risk of infection spreading. Its plans had been updated after experience of an outbreak.

    “The contingency plan demonstrated that the layout of the premises allowed zoning to reduce risk of Covid-19 spreading.” from the report
  • Cleaning and hygiene

    The home was clean and well maintained. Cleaning took place regularly, including on frequently touched areas.

    “The home was clean and well maintained. There was regular cleaning throughout the day and this included high-touch areas.” from the report
  • Protective equipment and testing

    Staff had supplies of protective equipment and training in how to use it. The report also describes regular testing and health checks for staff and residents.

    “Staff had received specific Covid-19 training, and this included guidance for staff about how to put on and take off PPE safely.” from the report
  • Keeping families in touch

    While most visits were stopped, staff supported people to use phone and video calls. The home had also created a separate visiting room for safer family contact.

    “Staff supported people to remain in contact with their families through a secured Facebook page, and phone and video calls at this time.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What are the current visiting arrangements, and is the separate room with a large window still available?
  2. 02How would the home isolate residents and organise staff if there were another infection outbreak?
  3. 03How often are residents and staff tested now, and what other health checks are carried out?
  4. 04How will the home help my relative keep in contact with family if visits are restricted?
  5. 05How often are high-touch areas cleaned, and how is staff use of protective equipment checked?

This was an announced, targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the service was inspected but not rated and the other areas were not assessed in this report. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 March 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Southdowns Nursing Home

5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  1. July 2023Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Southdowns Nursing Home →

  2. March 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Southdowns Nursing Home →

  3. December 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2016Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2015Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. February 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 February 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

19 live-in carers within about an hour of East Sussex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,000 to £1,400 a week. 13 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“When he point blank refused to go into hospital for a life saving blood transfusion she talked him through the situation and agreed to go in the ambulance with him and stayed until he was settled.”
Clare S., about Mihaela B.
“Una felt safe, secure and loved in her time with Debbie which is a gift that I am eternally grateful for.”
Tisana S., about Debra S.
See live-in carers near East SussexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.