Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Silverways Nursing Home

Requires improvementpublished 28 May 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the home was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2023

Silverways Nursing Home is rated Good; inspectors found safe, caring and well-managed support, with some staff still needing up-to-date fire drill practice.

Inspectors visited without notice on 19 October 2023. They spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and a visiting health professional. They also checked care and medicines records, recruitment files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that people felt safe, risks were reviewed, medicines were managed safely and there were enough suitably skilled staff. Infection prevention was also handled well.

The home was described as open, friendly and caring. Managers were visible, staff felt supported, and people and families were included in decisions. Not all staff were up to date with fire drill practice, although a drill was scheduled during the inspection.

This was not a full review of all five CQC questions. The Effective, Caring and Responsive ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection, published on 11 July 2018. The overall rating remained Good.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives said they felt safe. Risks such as falls, skin damage and choking were assessed and reviewed.

    “People and their families told us they felt safe.” from the report
  • Enough skilled staff

    Inspectors found enough staff with the right skills and experience. Recruitment checks included references, employment history and criminal record checks.

    “People were supported by enough staff with the right level of skills and experience to meet their care needs safely.” from the report
  • Safe medicines and infection control

    Medicines were given by trained staff whose competence was checked. The home was clean and had suitable infection control supplies.

    “People had their medicines managed safely.” from the report
  • Open management

    People, families and staff described the culture as open and friendly. Managers were visible and worked alongside staff.

    “The culture of the home was open, caring, and friendly.” from the report
  • Quality monitoring

    The home used audits and reviews to check areas such as medicines, infection control and health and safety. Incident learning was used to update care plans and training.

    “Quality assurance systems and processes were in place that included regular audits of key areas such as medicines, infection control and health and safety.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Fire drill practice

    minor

    Not all staff were up to date with fire drill practice. A fire drill was scheduled during the inspection.

    “Not all staff were up to date with fire drill practice.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has every staff member now completed up-to-date fire drill practice?
  2. 02How often are fire drills carried out, and how are staff who miss one followed up?
  3. 03How will my relative and our family be involved in care decisions and service meetings?
  4. 04How are medicines audits used to check that my relative's medicines are given safely?
  5. 05What changes have been made to create safer walkways and store equipment?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led; the Effective, Caring and Responsive ratings were carried forward from the inspection published on 11 July 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found infection control practices were in line with guidance.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 17 February 2021. It checked infection prevention and control because of the coronavirus outbreak. The home was not given an overall quality rating.

Inspectors found policies and staff practices followed the latest government guidance. They were assured that the home managed visitors, admissions, shielding, social distancing, protective equipment, testing and outbreaks safely.

The home had regular infection control audits. Inspectors also found clean premises, suitable cleaning products, staff training and checks on the use of protective equipment. Visiting was limited during the national lockdown, with extra checks for exceptional visits.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control audits

    The home carried out regular audits and completed identified actions promptly.

    “Regular IPC audits were completed, ensuring standards were met, and when actions were identified they were completed in a timely way.” from the report
  • Visitor safety

    Exceptional visits were risk assessed and arranged through a separate entrance. Visitors had temperature checks and rapid coronavirus tests.

    “Visitor checks included a temperature check and rapid Covid-19 test, which indicated a positive or negative test result within 30 minutes.” from the report
  • Staff training

    Staff had current infection control training, including how to use protective equipment and self-testing kits. Their skills were checked regularly.

    “Staff were up to date with infection, prevention and control training which had included safely putting on and taking off personal protective equipment (PPE) and the correct use of self-testing kits.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control arrangements are in place now, and how do they compare with those inspected in February 2021?
  2. 02How are visits managed now, including visits when someone is seriously ill or nearing the end of life?
  3. 03How often are infection control audits carried out, and can you explain any actions that are currently outstanding?
  4. 04What testing and vaccination arrangements are currently offered to people living in the home and to staff?
  5. 05What are the home’s current ratings for caring, effective, responsive and well-led care?

This was an announced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the home was inspected but not rated overall. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 March 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Silverways Nursing Home

3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Silverways Nursing Home →

  2. March 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Silverways Nursing Home →

  3. July 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2016Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. July 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

37 live-in carers within about an hour of Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,000 to £1,340 a week. 26 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“We could not have managed without her calm, reassuring presence and practical knowledge and skill in caring and supporting both my husband and the family and I.”
Pat A., about Gloria Z.
“I cannot recommend Prisca highly enough, she is one in a million.”
Emily B., about Prisca S.
See live-in carers near Bournemouth, Christchurch and PooleProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.