Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Signature at Banstead

Goodpublished 10 February 2025, 19 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with strong activities and management.

This was an unannounced inspection on 31 January 2023. Inspectors spoke with people using the home, relatives, staff and health and social care professionals. They also observed care and checked care plans, medicine records, staff files and management records.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines support, suitable risk assessments and good infection control. Staff were trained and worked well with other professionals.

People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. They were involved in decisions about their care and had personalised activities, food choices and support. Inspectors described a positive and inclusive culture, with people, relatives and staff involved in improving the home.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    People were supported by staff who knew them well and treated them with dignity. Staff asked about people's choices and respected their privacy.

    “People were supported by kind and caring staff that treated them with dignity and respect.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's preferences, life histories and communication needs. Staff followed these details in day-to-day care.

    “People received personalised care from staff that knew them well.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    The home offered activities based on people's interests, including individual activities and trips out. Staff also supported people to maintain important family relationships.

    “Activities were designed to meet people's individual needs and preferences.” from the report
  • Open management

    Inspectors found that people, relatives and staff could share ideas and concerns. Audits and meetings were used to drive improvements.

    “There was a person-centred, positive, inclusive culture at the home that was promoted by staff and the registered manager.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you assess and manage my relative's individual risks, including falls or changes in mobility?
  2. 02How would you support my relative's specific communication needs, particularly if they are living with dementia or have hearing difficulties?
  3. 03What activities could you offer that match my relative's interests, preferences and past hobbies?
  4. 04How would you keep me informed about changes in my relative's health and any referrals to health professionals?
  5. 05How can relatives raise concerns, and how will we be updated about the response?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions and infection prevention and control; it was the first inspection of this newly registered service. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 March 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Signature at Banstead

3 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Signature at Banstead →

  2. August 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  3. January 2017Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. December 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 December 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

77 live-in carers within about an hour of Surrey

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 66 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Without his support we wouldn't have been able to navigate bringing and keeping Dad at home.”
Emma P., about Aman A.
“Not only has she looked after him beautifully, she has also been great company for him with lively conversation, kindness and humour.”
Clare M., about Zion S.
See live-in carers near SurreyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.