Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Salvete Care Home

Goodpublished 29 December 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home used personal protective equipment effectively, managed visitors and admissions safely, supported testing, and had measures to prevent or manage infection outbreaks.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured that infection prevention and control measures were safe during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Inspectors made an unannounced, targeted visit on 22 December 2020. They looked at infection prevention and control because the home was responding to coronavirus outbreaks.

They found several precautions in place. Visitors were restricted to essential visits, people entering had checks and wore full personal protective equipment, and staff used protective equipment when supporting people.

The home had changed its routines for medicines and personal care, separated items used by people with COVID-19, increased cleaning, and stored incoming items for 72 hours. Inspectors said they were assured about the infection control arrangements they checked.

The service was inspected but not rated. This report does not provide a full rating of the home or ratings for all five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor precautions

    The home restricted visits to essential visitors and carried out checks before anyone entered.

    “The service was only receiving essential visitors at the time of our inspection.” from the report
  • Use of protective equipment

    Staff used full protective equipment when supporting people, including people with and without COVID-19.

    “People were supported by staff in full PPE, whether that person was COVID-19 positive or negative.” from the report
  • Cleaning and infection control

    The building was clean and the cleaning schedule included regular disinfection of frequently touched areas.

    “The building was clean and free from clutter.” from the report
  • Separate handling of items

    The home used separate arrangements for crockery, laundry and incoming items to reduce the spread of infection.

    “A room had been designated to store all items coming into the service for 72 hours to prevent the spread of any infection entering the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control measures are in place now, and how have they changed since the December 2020 inspection?
  2. 02How are visitors currently screened and supported to avoid spreading infection?
  3. 03How does the home manage COVID-19 or other infection outbreaks now?
  4. 04How often are frequently touched areas cleaned, and how is this recorded?
  5. 05What is the home’s current policy for testing people using the service and staff?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control practices only; the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 January 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2018

Salvete Care Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and well-organised care with no serious risks identified.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 25 October 2018. Two inspectors observed care, meals and activities, spoke with people, a relative and staff, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and management records.

All five areas were rated Good: safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. Inspectors found enough suitably trained staff, safe medicines systems, personalised care and good support with food, drink and health appointments.

The home had a calm and friendly atmosphere. People were involved in their care, supported to make choices and encouraged to join activities. Complaints had been handled appropriately and quality checks were used to make improvements.

The previous inspection also rated the service Good. The rating stayed the same, and inspectors found no evidence of serious risks or concerns.

What inspectors praised
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff with different skills to meet people's assessed needs. Recruitment checks were completed before staff were employed.

    “There were sufficient staff, with varying skills, on duty to support people with their assessed needs.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff treated people as individuals and respected their privacy, dignity and choices. Inspectors saw calm, considerate support, including after a fall and during personal care.

    “People were treated with care, kindness and compassion and they told us this was without exception.” from the report
  • Personalised activities

    The home offered activities based on people's interests. People staying in their rooms could have one-to-one activities.

    “Staff found out about people's interests and passions.” from the report
  • Visible management and monitoring

    The management team was available throughout the week. The home used audits, meetings and action plans to check standards and make improvements.

    “Quality audits in all areas such as water temperatures, equipment and care plans were completed and action plans produced and adhered to because of this.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are the recently introduced electronic care plans working now, and how do you check that records are kept up to date?
  2. 02How would you meet my relative's specific dietary needs, likes and dislikes?
  3. 03What activities would you offer if my relative stayed in their room or could not take part in group activities?
  4. 04How would you support my relative's end-of-life wishes and involve our family in planning?
  5. 05Who would we speak to if we had a concern, and how would it be recorded and followed up?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions and the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 December 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Salvete Care Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Salvete Care Home →

  2. December 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Salvete Care Home →

  3. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

88 live-in carers within about an hour of Bedford

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 76 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
Bridget S., about Nyarai N.
“She handled the new situation in front of her with such professionalism and I felt I could trust her 100%.”
Siobhan D., about Sithabile Tabile M.
See live-in carers near BedfordProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.