Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Roundhay Wood Apartments

Goodpublished 4 May 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment checks, suitable risk assessments and safe medicines management. They also found systems for responding to abuse, accidents and other incidents.
Effective?
Good
Staff received induction, training and supervision. Care plans reflected people's current needs, health needs, communication and cultural needs, and the home worked with health and social care professionals.
Caring?
Good
People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff understood people's histories, preferences and communication needs, and supported independence.
Responsive?
Good
Care was personalised and reviewed to reflect people's needs and preferences. People were supported to maintain relationships, access their local communities and take part in meaningful activities.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found effective leadership, regular staff training and meetings, and robust systems for checking quality and safety. The home had an improvement plan, including involving people more in their care plans.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2023

Roundhay Wood Apartments is Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care with strong support for choice and independence.

This was the first inspection since the home registered in October 2021. It was unannounced and took place on 4 and 12 April 2023. One inspector and an Expert by Experience spoke with a person living at the home, relatives, staff and visiting professionals. They also observed care and checked care, medicines, recruitment and quality records.

The inspectors found that all five areas were Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. They found enough trained staff, safe medicines arrangements, personalised care plans and support for people to make choices and take part in community activities.

The home was led effectively. Staff understood people's needs and relatives said they felt involved and could raise concerns. The report also noted an improvement plan to involve people more in writing and reviewing their care plans.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised support

    Care plans were detailed and up to date. Staff knew people's likes, dislikes, communication needs and aspirations.

    “People's care plans were up to date, personalised, and reflected their current needs and aspirations, including physical and mental health needs.” from the report
  • Choice and independence

    People were supported to make choices, have control over their lives and use the least restrictive approach possible.

    “People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors observed respectful interactions and relatives spoke positively about the care and communication.

    “People received kind and compassionate care from staff. People were comfortable in the company of staff, and staff we observed demonstrated respect when interacting with people.” from the report
  • Community involvement

    People were supported to maintain relationships and take part in activities that mattered to them, both at home and in the community.

    “Care records showed people were supported to be active in their local communities, in order to avoid social isolation.” from the report
  • Staff training and leadership

    Staff had induction, ongoing training and supervision. Inspectors found positive leadership and effective systems for monitoring quality and safety.

    “Systems for audit, quality assurance and questioning of practice were robust and operated effectively.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • More involvement in care plans

    minor

    The improvement plan included finding ways to involve people more in writing and reviewing their care plans. Ask how this is being put into practice for your relative.

    “This included looking at ways involve people more in the writing and reviewing of their care plans.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will my relative be involved in writing and reviewing their care plan?
  2. 02How do you make sure staffing levels change when people's needs change?
  3. 03How do you review medicines, including 'as required' medicines, and work to avoid over-medication?
  4. 04How will you support my relative's communication needs and make sure staff understand what they are communicating?
  5. 05What activities and community opportunities would be available for my relative?

This was an unannounced first inspection covering all five CQC questions, including care, premises, infection prevention and quality systems. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 May 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Roundhay Wood Apartments

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. May 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Roundhay Wood Apartments →

  2. October 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 8 October 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Leeds

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 89 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Took his time to learn about me read my care plan and to listen to me. great companionship with lots of laughing.”
Jasmine A., about Joseph M.
See live-in carers near LeedsProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.