Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Roselawn House

Goodpublished 8 January 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home was preventing infections, using PPE safely, arranging testing and following visiting guidance. The provider also said it had measures to manage COVID-19-related staffing pressures.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2022

Roselawn House was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and visiting arrangements.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 25 February 2022. It looked at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and whether COVID-19 staffing pressures affected the home.

Inspectors found the home clean, tidy and hygienic. They were assured that the home used personal protective equipment safely, carried out testing, followed visiting guidance and kept its infection control policy up to date.

The home was inspected but not rated. This report does not give an overall quality rating or a rated result for the other four questions.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean home

    The home was clean and hygienic, with regular cleaning and infection control procedures.

    “The home was clean, tidy and hygienic and cleaning and IPC procedures were carried out regularly and in line with best practice.” from the report
  • Infection control

    Staff had infection control training, including how to use PPE and wash their hands safely. Inspectors were assured that PPE and testing arrangements were effective.

    “We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
  • Family contact

    Visiting arrangements followed government guidance. People could also keep in touch with family and friends by video and telephone.

    “People were also able to keep in touch with family and friends using video and telephone calls.” from the report
  • Communication with families

    The provider kept people and their families informed about COVID-19, government guidance and the home's arrangements.

    “The provider kept people and their families informed about COVID-19, government guidance and the arrangements for the home.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What measures are currently in place to manage staffing pressures, and have staffing pressures affected people living in the home?
  2. 02How often are the home's infection prevention and control procedures reviewed and updated?
  3. 03What are the current visiting arrangements for families?
  4. 04How are people supported to keep in touch with family and friends if they cannot visit in person?
  5. 05How are testing and infection control arrangements managed when professionals visit the home?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 April 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2020

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found appropriate infection control and good support for visits during the Covid-19 pandemic.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 28 August 2020. It looked at infection prevention and control measures during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found appropriate arrangements for visitors, including temperature checks, symptom screening, face coverings and hand washing. They were assured that the home was using protective equipment safely, following social distancing rules and accessing Covid-19 testing.

Staff had training about infection control, protective equipment and supporting people with learning disabilities during the pandemic. The home also supported people to keep in touch with relatives through planned garden visits.

The home was inspected but not rated. This means the visit did not give an overall quality rating or full ratings for the five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors had temperature checks, symptom screening and Covid-19 risk assessments before entering. They also had to wear face coverings and wash their hands.

    “They were required to have their temperatures taken, complete a Covid 19 risk assessment which included screening for symptoms of Covid 19 before being allowed to enter the home.” from the report
  • Keeping families connected

    People were supported to meet relatives and friends in sheltered garden areas, with distancing and cleaning between visits.

    “The provider made very good provision for people using the service to maintain links with family members, relatives and friends.” from the report
  • Staff training and support

    Staff received training about infection control, protective equipment and supporting people with learning disabilities during the pandemic. Support was also available for their mental wellbeing.

    “The provider ensured that all their staff received appropriate training and support to understand and to manage Covid 19.” from the report
  • Testing arrangements

    The home was following government guidance on Covid-19 testing for people living there and staff.

    “The provider had appropriate arrangements to test people and staff for Covid 19 and was following government guidance on testing.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What are the current arrangements for relatives to visit, and how are visiting areas cleaned between visits?
  2. 02How often are people living at the home and staff tested for Covid-19 now?
  3. 03How do you make sure new and existing staff follow infection control and protective equipment guidance?
  4. 04What support is available if a person living at the home finds pandemic restrictions difficult to understand?
  5. 05How are infection outbreaks prevented or managed if one is suspected?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures during the coronavirus pandemic; it did not provide a full rating of the home. This explanation was written from the published report of 1 October 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Roselawn House

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. April 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Roselawn House →

  2. October 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Roselawn House →

  3. January 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Croydon

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She cared for my mum with Alzheimer's with endless patience and kindness, always arriving with a smile and a positive attitude”
Marie-anne B., about Carla A.
“Terry has been of invaluable help to our family while working as a part-time live-in carer for our mother for approximately 6 months”
Bianca V., about Terry S.
See live-in carers near CroydonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.