Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Risedale at Aldingham Nursing Home

Goodpublished 1 December 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People said they felt safe. Inspectors found safe moving and handling, appropriate recruitment checks, flexible staffing and effective safeguarding arrangements. They recommended better monitoring of some as-required medicines and found three incidents had not been reported to the CQC.
Effective?
Good
People received care with their consent and staff understood mental capacity requirements. Nutrition and hydration support was strong, with dietitians and speech and language professionals involved, although one person's diet was not being recorded and monitored despite a very high choking risk.
Caring?
Good
Inspectors saw respectful, warm and dignified interactions. Staff knew people's preferences, protected their privacy and involved relatives in care and decisions.
Responsive?
Outstanding
Staff adapted care to people's individual needs, including dementia-related distress and changing health. Inspectors found particularly strong end-of-life, bereavement, family support and activities that reflected people's interests.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found strong leadership, a positive culture and regular checks on quality and safety. Managers responded quickly when issues were identified, including changing reporting procedures after the missed notifications.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe care and Outstanding responsiveness, with a few records and reporting issues needing attention.

Inspectors visited on two days and spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and health professionals. They reviewed care records, medicines, recruitment files, training, incidents and the building. They also observed how staff supported people, including people who could not easily communicate.

The home was rated Good overall. Safe, Effective, Caring and Well-led were all rated Good. Responsive was rated Outstanding. Inspectors found people were treated with kindness and dignity, staff understood their needs, staffing was flexible, and the home was clean and well maintained.

The strongest findings were about personalised activities, support for people living with dementia, and end-of-life and bereavement care. Inspectors also found some issues. Records for some as-required medicines did not make stock monitoring easy, one person's choking-related diet records were not complete, and three incidents had not been reported to the CQC as required. The home acted on these issues during or immediately after the inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • End-of-life support

    The home provided highly personalised support to people nearing the end of life and to their families. It had specialist training, an end-of-life strategy and links with a local hospice.

    “The service was particularly skilled at caring for and supporting people and their families at the end of life, responding to changing needs and working with other professionals.” from the report
  • Personalised activities

    Activities were based on people's interests, history and abilities. Inspectors saw individual and group activities, trips out and support for people living with dementia to take part in meaningful experiences.

    “This individualised approach helped people to have a special memory or recall things that had held meaning for them and enabled them to participate in a life-affirming events that mattered to them.” from the report
  • Skilled staff and partnership working

    Staff received induction, ongoing training and opportunities to gain further qualifications. The home worked closely with health professionals, which inspectors said helped meet complex needs.

    “We identified that the service had an established and settled staff team, who were well trained, confident and knowledgeable.” from the report
  • Food and nutrition

    The home used specialist advice and tailored menus to meet different nutritional and swallowing needs. People and relatives spoke positively about the food.

    “The home had a well-researched and evidence based system for the planning of people's meals to meet different nutritional requirements and diets such as pureed food.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • As-required medicine records

    needs fixing

    Some as-required medicines did not have stock balances carried forward. Inspectors recommended reviewing the process so these medicines could be monitored more effectively.

    “Some as required medicines had not had stock balances carried forward for ease of monitoring and we made a recommendation that the service took advice and reviewed their procedure on this for more effective monitoring.” from the report
  • Choking-risk diet records

    serious

    One person at very high risk of choking, who had experienced choking episodes, did not have their diet recorded and monitored. The manager corrected this during the inspection.

    “However, we noted one person who was assessed as at a "very high risk" of choking and had experienced choking episodes but were not having their diet recorded and monitored.” from the report
  • Missed incident notifications

    needs fixing

    Three incidents had not been reported to the CQC when they should have been. The provider investigated this as an error and changed its guidance and manager protocols immediately.

    “However, on examining the home's records of accidents and incidents we found three incidents that we had not been notified about but should have been.” from the report
  • Shared moving-and-handling slings

    needs fixing

    Some people did not have their own sling for hoisting. Managers began putting individual slings in place during the inspection because sharing could increase the risk of cross-infection.

    “Slings are classed as a medical device and sharing these devices increases the risk to people of cross infection occurring.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now record and check stock balances for all as-required medicines?
  2. 02What checks are in place to make sure people at risk of choking have their diets recorded and monitored?
  3. 03How do you make sure every reportable incident is notified to the CQC on time?
  4. 04Does each person who needs hoisting now have their own correctly sized sling?
  5. 05How would you involve our family in end-of-life planning and bereavement support?

This was described as a comprehensive inspection, but the report gives two different inspection date ranges: 8 and 9 October 2018 in the summary and 17 and 18 September 2018 in the detailed findings. This explanation was written from the published report of 1 December 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Risedale at Aldingham Nursing Home

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Risedale at Aldingham Nursing Home →

  2. June 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

9 live-in carers within about an hour of Westmorland and Furness

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

8 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

See live-in carers near Westmorland and FurnessProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.