Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Ribble Valley Care Home

Goodpublished 23 February 2026, 7 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2022

Ribble Valley Care Home was rated Good; inspectors found caring, safe care, with a recommendation to improve controlled medicines records.

This was an unannounced inspection on 21 July 2022. Inspectors spoke with five people, five relatives and four staff. They reviewed care records, medicines records, recruitment files and the home's management records.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, suitable training, person-centred care and positive relationships between people and staff.

The main shortfall was in recording controlled medicines. The correct amount of medicine was present, but records were not always completed properly. Inspectors made a recommendation for the provider to review its practice.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw positive relationships between staff and people. People said staff were kind, respectful and compassionate.

    “We observed positive interactions between staff and people who used the service. People were addressed by their preferred names and always greeted by staff.” from the report
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Staff had criminal record checks before starting work, and inspectors found enough staff on duty to meet people's needs and keep them safe.

    “Staff were safely recruited and inducted into their roles and there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs and keep them safe.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans reflected people's needs, choices and communication preferences. Staff knew people well and provided support in line with their plans.

    “The content of people's care records demonstrated staff had a good knowledge of people's needs, and this supported staff to deliver individualised care to each person.” from the report
  • Activities and involvement

    People were offered activities based on their interests, and people and relatives were involved in care planning and making suggestions.

    “The provider employed an activity coordinator who arranged a programme of activities and entertainment according to people's preferences.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Controlled medicines records

    needs fixing

    The correct amount of controlled medicines was present, but the records were not completed properly. Inspectors recommended that the provider review its recording practice.

    “Medicines were overall managed safely. However, we identified an issue with the recording of controlled medications.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to the recording of controlled medicines since the inspection?
  2. 02How are controlled medicines checked now, and who reviews the records?
  3. 03Has the manager completed registration with the CQC?
  4. 04How was the refurbishment managed, and which areas of the home are still affected?

This was the first inspection of the newly registered service and covered all five CQC key questions, each of which was rated Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 August 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Ribble Valley Care Home

4 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. August 2022Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Ribble Valley Care Home →

  2. June 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  3. February 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. August 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  5. May 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 May 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

85 live-in carers within about an hour of Lancashire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She understands the needs of an elderly person in the early stages of dementia and has treated my mother with great kindness and skill.”
Simon W., about Ncebakazi V.
“Thanks to Tracy, Dad was always immaculately dressed and clean, his meals were all home cooked and nutritionally well balanced and his home was always kept really clean and tidy.”
Jackie S., about Tracy O.
See live-in carers near LancashireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.