Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Regent Residential Care Home

Goodpublished 14 February 2018, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines support, checks on equipment and the environment, and action to reduce risks such as falls, choking, infection and anxiety.
Effective?
Good
Staff were trained to meet people's needs. People were supported with food, drinks, healthcare, specialist appointments and decisions made in their best interests.
Caring?
Good
People had trusting relationships with staff. Staff respected people's choices, privacy, dignity and independence.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans reflected people's histories, wishes and preferences. Staff adjusted care when needs changed and had processes for handling complaints.
Well-led?
Good
People, relatives and staff spoke positively about the management. The provider and manager carried out checks on care quality and acted on feedback and areas for development.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2018

Regent Residential Care Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and person-centred care, with care planning information still being moved to a new system.

This was a comprehensive inspection. The first visit was unannounced on 14 December 2017, followed by an announced visit on 18 December 2017. Inspectors observed care, spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care records, medicines, staff training, complaints and management checks.

The home was caring for 62 people, including older people and people living with dementia. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines support, suitable training, clean surroundings and systems to learn from incidents. People were supported with food, drinks, healthcare and their individual risks.

Inspectors found kind relationships between people and staff. People were supported to make daily choices, keep their dignity and independence, follow their interests and raise concerns. The home was also found to be well managed, with checks on care quality and action taken in response to feedback.

The overall rating was Good, and each of the five areas was also rated Good. This means the home remained Good since the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    People and relatives said there were enough staff. Medicines were given by trained staff, with clear records and regular checks.

    “We saw staff kept clear records of the medicines people had received and regular checks were made to ensure people had the medicines they required.” from the report
  • Kind relationships

    People appeared comfortable with staff, who took time to talk with them and understand how they preferred to communicate and be supported.

    “People had built strong and trusting relationships with the staff that cared for them, and enjoyed spending time with staff.” from the report
  • Choice and dignity

    People were supported to choose their routines, food, clothing and activities. Staff promoted privacy, dignity and independence.

    “Staff recognised people's rights to dignity, independence and privacy and promoted these.” from the report
  • Individual care

    Care planning took account of people's histories, interests and preferences. Staff supported people to continue activities that mattered to them.

    “We saw people's care plans and risk assessments reflected their individual needs and how they liked to be supported.” from the report
  • Open management

    Relatives and staff found senior staff approachable. The home used meetings, surveys and checks to improve care and the environment.

    “The registered manager and provider undertook regular checks to ensure this happened and that people benefited from receiving a good standard of care.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Care information was being transferred

    minor

    The home was introducing new ways to plan and review care. Information about people's histories and preferences was still being transferred to the new system, so families should check how this is now kept up to date.

    “The registered manager told us there were in the process of transferring this information onto the new system.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has the transfer to the new care planning system been completed, and how do you check that staff have the latest information?
  2. 02How do you record and respond when a person's needs, health or medicines change?
  3. 03How do you make sure there are enough staff at the times residents want support?
  4. 04How are residents supported to continue activities and interests that are important to them?
  5. 05What feedback from residents and relatives has led to recent changes in the home or gardens?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five questions, with an unannounced visit on 14 December 2017 and an announced visit on 18 December 2017 to complete it. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 February 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Regent Residential Care Home

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Regent Residential Care Home →

  2. November 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. September 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Worcestershire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 85 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.

“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near WorcestershireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.