CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Portland Road
Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.
What inspectors found, July 2017
Rated Outstanding overall; inspectors found safe, kind and highly personalised care, with strong support for recovery and independence.
Inspectors carried out an unannounced inspection and spoke with people living at the home, managers, staff and mental health professionals. They reviewed care plans, risk assessments, medicines arrangements, staff records, training, audits and the building.
The home supported up to nine people with mental health needs, substance misuse, anxiety and physical health needs. Inspectors found a calm and welcoming home where people were involved in planning their support, making decisions and helping to run the service.
The home was rated Good for safe, caring and well-led care. It was rated Outstanding for effective and responsive care. The overall rating was Outstanding. The previous inspection in November 2013 had found no concerns.
Recovery and independence
The home focused on recovery and helped people build skills, make choices and move towards more independent living.
“The delivery of care at Portland Road was built on the promotion of mental health recovery.” from the report
People have a real voice
People were involved in care planning, staff induction, policies, budgets, surveys and decisions about the home.
“Co-production (developing the service in an equal and reciprocal relationship between staff and people) was at the heart of the service.” from the report
Skilled and responsive staff
Staff had specialist training and recognised signs that people's mental health was worsening. They worked with outside professionals to respond early.
“They are very good at liaising with me at an early stage if they feel a client’s mental health is deteriorating which means we can then look at interventions.” from the report
Respectful relationships
Inspectors saw staff treating people with dignity and respect. People had privacy in their bedrooms and staff understood their individual preferences.
“Without exception, we observed that staff treated people with dignity and respect.” from the report
House meeting records
minorA person said that house meeting minutes did not always accurately record what people had said. Staff were working with people to improve the records.
“One person told us how house meeting minutes were poorly recorded and did not accurately reflect contributions, and left issues coming back repeatedly.” from the report
- 01How are Wellness Recovery Action Plans created and reviewed when someone's mental health starts to deteriorate?
- 02How do you decide when a person is ready to self-administer medicines, and how are required blood tests monitored?
- 03What changes have been made to the recording of house meeting minutes?
- 04How quickly can extra staff be provided when a person's mental health is deteriorating?
- 05How are people currently involved in care planning, budgets, activities and decisions about the home?
This was an unannounced inspection covering all five quality areas, with records and care plans reviewed; the report gives 24 November 2015 as the inspection date in one place and 25 November 2015 in its header. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 July 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk. The report was longer than we could read in one go; the later sections may not be reflected.
Every inspection of Portland Road
Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.
- July 2017Outstandingcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: OutstandingCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good
- December 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
46 live-in carers within about an hour of Brighton and Hove
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £1,020 to £1,280 a week. 37 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.
“Lottie showed incredible patience and empathy, adapting her routine to fit in with Mum's moods. Most importantly, Lottie's cheerful manner helped Mum to get some enjoyment out of life.”
“He was infinitely patient with them and got on very well with us to the extent that we now regard him as a personal friend.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.