Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Polesworth Group Friary Road

Goodpublished 17 April 2026, 5 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found kind, effective care, with staffing and food safety arrangements being improved.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 28 November 2018. The inspector and an expert by experience spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff, the manager and the provider. They observed care and checked care plans, daily records, medicine records and quality checks.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People were supported by staff who knew them well. Inspectors found that people received their medicines, had access to healthcare and were supported to make choices and take part in activities they enjoyed.

The home had identified some changing care needs and was increasing daytime staffing. Inspectors also found some smaller issues, including food storage risks, shared bathroom towels and missing toilet locks. The overall Good rating was maintained from the previous inspection in May 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People were relaxed with staff who knew them well. Staff promoted choice, privacy and independence.

    “Staff were polite to people, had a caring attitude and promoted people to make choices.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's interests, preferences and communication needs. Staff supported people to take part in activities they enjoyed.

    “People's needs were assessed and everyone had an individual plan of care.” from the report
  • Good staff training

    The staff team had worked at the home for several years and had completed the required training and refresher updates.

    “The care staff team of five had all worked at the home for several years, and had completed all of the training they needed” from the report
  • Support with health

    People were supported with healthy eating, medicines and visits to healthcare professionals.

    “Staff supported people to visit healthcare professionals when needed.” from the report
  • Quality checks

    The provider and manager used audits, monitoring visits and feedback to identify and address improvements.

    “There was an effective system of internal audits and checks undertaken within the home to ensure the safety and quality of the service was maintained.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staffing on some shifts

    needs fixing

    Some shifts had previously been covered by one staff member, while people's needs were changing. The provider was recruiting and planned to have two staff on daytime shifts consistently.

    “The provider had recognised some people's changing needs and had begun to look at staffing arrangements for shifts.” from the report
  • Food storage risk

    needs fixing

    One person moved cooked food around the home, creating a possible food safety risk. The manager planned to store high-risk food in a locked garage fridge.

    “The registered manager was taking immediate action to ensure all high-risk foods were stored in a fridge located in the locked garage.” from the report
  • Shared bathroom towel

    minor

    Some shared bathrooms did not have paper towels and used a shared cotton towel. Staff were told to change it during shifts to reduce infection risks.

    “Some communal bathroom facilities did not have paper towels and a shared communal cotton towel increased potential risks of cross infection.” from the report
  • Toilet privacy

    minor

    Shared ground-floor toilets did not have locks when inspected. Action was being taken to address this.

    “The chief executive officer had recently identified shared ground floor toilets did not have locks fitted for people to use” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Are there now two staff members on all daytime shifts, and how is cover arranged when someone is absent?
  2. 02Was the locked garage fridge put in place for high-risk foods, and how is food safety checked now?
  3. 03How are shared bathroom towels managed to reduce the risk of cross infection?
  4. 04Were locks fitted to the shared ground-floor toilets, and how do people get privacy there now?
  5. 05What further measures were put in place after the safeguarding incident mentioned in the report?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, and the Good ratings were maintained from May 2016. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 December 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Polesworth Group Friary Road

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Polesworth Group Friary Road →

  2. June 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warwickshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near WarwickshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.