Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Polebank Hall Residential Care Home

Goodpublished 21 February 2018, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about testing, PPE, safe admissions, visiting, cleaning and the management of infection risks. This was a targeted infection prevention and control inspection, not a full safety assessment.
Effective?
Good
This area was not assessed in the report.
Caring?
Good
This area was not assessed in the report, although inspectors noted activities and arrangements to help people keep in touch with relatives.
Responsive?
Good
This area was not assessed in the report.
Well-led?
Good
This area was not assessed as a separate quality question. Inspectors did note regular contact with local authority and public health teams, together with audits and monitoring of infection control.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2021

Targeted inspection found strong infection control measures, but the home was inspected and not rated.

The inspection took place on 10 June 2021 and was announced. It was a targeted check of infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inspectors found that the home had procedures for safe admissions, COVID-19 testing, personal protective equipment and visiting. They were assured that infection risks were being managed in line with guidance.

The home was described as extremely clean. Inspectors also found detailed risk assessments, regular audits and monitoring, and activities to help people stay in touch with relatives and others.

This report does not give an overall quality rating. The safe question was inspected but not rated, and the other four areas were not covered in this inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean environment

    Inspectors found the home extremely clean, with cleaning schedules completed daily and weekly.

    “The home was extremely clean. Comprehensive cleaning schedules were in place and carried out daily and weekly.” from the report
  • Infection control

    The home had measures for testing, PPE, safe admissions, visiting and preventing or managing outbreaks.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
  • Keeping people connected

    Staff supported contact with friends and relatives during visiting restrictions and provided activities to support people's wellbeing.

    “Whilst restrictions on visiting had been in place based on Government guidance, staff and the registered manager had ensured people were kept in touch with their friends and relatives.” from the report
  • Oversight of infection control

    The manager and provider used risk assessments, policies, audits and monitoring to oversee infection control.

    “The registered manager and provider had a range of auditing and monitoring in place to ensure infection control procedures were being followed properly.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are visitors currently tested, protected and supported to visit safely?
  2. 02How often are cleaning schedules completed now, and how is this checked?
  3. 03What arrangements are in place for COVID-19 or other infection outbreaks?
  4. 04How are new residents admitted safely and assessed for infection risks?
  5. 05Can you show how residents are supported to keep in touch with relatives and take part in activities?

This was an announced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures; it did not provide a full rating or assess the other four key questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 25 June 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind care, but some records and legal safeguards needed attention.

This was an unannounced inspection on 11 December 2017. One inspector spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and visiting healthcare professionals. The inspector also checked care plans, medicines records, staff files, training records and quality checks.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, suitable risk assessments, kind and respectful care, personalised care plans and activities.

There were some shortfalls. One inhaler record was not signed, medicine temperature checks were not up to date, and some nutrition support was not recorded as required. Some Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards applications had not been made at the time of the visit, although these were submitted shortly afterwards.

The home had improved since the May 2016 inspection, when it was rated Requires Improvement overall and breached Regulation 12 about safe care and treatment. At this inspection, the earlier medicine and infection control concerns had been acted on and the ratings improved to Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Staffing levels were based on people's needs. Inspectors saw staff responding promptly to help people move, use the toilet, and eat and drink.

    “We observed people being supported in a timely manner with tasks such as mobilising around the home, being assisted to the toilet and being supported to eat and drink.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    People, relatives and healthcare professionals spoke positively about the care. Inspectors observed privacy, dignity, choice and respectful support.

    “During the inspection we saw people being treated with dignity and respect by staff.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's care needs, risks, life histories and preferences. The home also used signs and photographs to help people living with dementia find their way around.

    “This meant staff had access to person centred information about people who lived at the home.” from the report
  • Activities

    People could join in a range of activities, trips and events. Inspectors saw people enjoying singing with a visiting choir.

    “There was a daily activities programme in place at Polebank Hall and during our inspection a local choir visited the home to sing Christmas carols with people which both staff and people living at the home enjoyed.” from the report
  • Improved management

    The home had regular audits, staff meetings and handovers. Inspectors found that concerns from the previous inspection had been acted on.

    “They informed us that these concerns had been acted upon immediately and we found this to be the case during the inspection.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine records

    needs fixing

    One medication record was not signed for an inhaler on two days. One person's record also did not contain a photograph, which the manager said would be added.

    “We found one MAR where the member of staff had not signed to say a person had used their inhaler on two days in November 2017.” from the report
  • Medicine temperature checks

    needs fixing

    Checks of the medicine fridge and treatment room had not been completed for three days before the inspection.

    “Temperature checks were recorded for both the medicines fridge and treatment room, however we noted these were last completed three days (on the previous Friday) prior to our inspection.” from the report
  • Nutrition records

    needs fixing

    For two people who needed extra calories, records did not always show the recommended snacks and drinks. Inspectors noted that only biscuits were being offered, although people's weight was stable.

    “However, when we checked these people's food and fluid records, these were not always being documented by staff and only biscuits were being offered.” from the report
  • Mental capacity assessments

    needs fixing

    The manager said people's capacity was judged without formal assessments. Inspectors recommended using formal assessments so people's ability to make choices was fully recognised.

    “This meant there could be a risk of not fully recognising people's abilities to make their own choices and decisions.” from the report
  • Deprivation of Liberty applications

    needs fixing

    At the inspection, some applications still needed to be made. The manager later confirmed that all the identified applications had been submitted.

    “The registered manager said they had identified the need to submit DoLS applications for a number of other people living at the home, although due to time constraints, had not yet done this.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now check that inhaler and other medicine records are signed every time?
  2. 02How often are the medicine fridge and treatment room temperatures checked, and can we see the latest records?
  3. 03How do you record that people have received the extra snacks and drinks recommended by dieticians?
  4. 04Have formal mental capacity assessments been completed where needed, and how are families involved?
  5. 05Were all the identified Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards applications accepted and are any still awaiting a decision?

This was an unannounced inspection of the overall service, including the premises and care, and all five key questions were rated Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 February 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Polebank Hall Residential Care Home

4 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. June 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Polebank Hall Residential Care Home →

  2. February 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Polebank Hall Residential Care Home →

  3. July 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. May 2015Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Tameside

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 90 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
See live-in carers near TamesideProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.