Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at 136 Manor Court Road

Goodpublished 15 May 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2018

People in Action - 136 Manor Court Road is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some records and checks needing improvement.

Inspectors visited on 6 and 7 February 2018. The first visit was unannounced. They spoke with people, relatives, staff, managers and the provider. They also checked care records, medicines, recruitment records, complaints and quality checks.

The home was clean and people told inspectors they felt safe. There were enough staff, medicines were managed safely, and staff understood safeguarding and people's individual risks. People received support with health care, food, activities and daily choices.

Inspectors found staff treated people with dignity and kindness. Care was personalised and people were supported to maintain relationships, interests and independence. The home was rated Good in all five areas and overall. This was unchanged from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives said they felt safe. Staff were trained to recognise abuse, report concerns and manage individual risks.

    “Everyone we spoke with told us they felt safe being supported at the home.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful support

    Staff treated people with dignity and kindness. People were supported to have privacy, make choices and build independence.

    “People told us staff were caring and treated them with dignity and respect.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care records described people's communication, preferences, needs and goals. Staff supported people with activities, relationships and community involvement.

    “People's care records were written in a way which helped staff to deliver personalised care” from the report
  • Safe medicines support

    Staff were trained and assessed as competent to give medicines. Audits identified recording errors quickly and action was taken.

    “People received their medicines when required.” from the report
  • Responsive management

    The manager knew people's needs and staff said issues were dealt with. The provider and manager carried out checks on the service.

    “The registered manager monitored and audited the quality and safety of the service provided through a range of checks.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Cleaning checks

    needs fixing

    The home was clean and tidy, but there was no system at the time of inspection to check how well cleaning and infection prevention were being carried out. The manager later sent information about a new recording and checking process.

    “However, there was no system to audit how effectively cleaning tasks were completed, or how effectively infection was being prevented.” from the report
  • Recording progress

    needs fixing

    Records did not always clearly show the progress people made towards their personal outcomes. The manager had changed daily records from 1 February 2018 to improve this.

    “However, progress made in relation to these outcomes was not always clearly recorded.” from the report
  • Future wishes

    needs fixing

    Care records did not include people's preferences for end-of-life care where this was not immediately relevant. The home agreed that future planning was important and would begin this with people's agreement.

    “People's care records did not include information about their preferences at the end of their lives.” from the report
  • Radiator safety

    minor

    Inspectors saw uncovered radiators. The manager said people living there had not been assessed as being at risk, but agreed to review this and act if needed.

    “We observed radiators in 136 Manor Court Road did not have covers to protect people from the risk of burning or scalding themselves.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What cleaning checks are now completed, and how do you act on any problems found?
  2. 02How do you record each person's progress towards their goals and outcomes?
  3. 03Have you discussed and recorded each person's wishes for future and end-of-life care?
  4. 04Have the uncovered radiators been reviewed, and what action was taken to manage any risk?
  5. 05How often is family and resident feedback collected, reviewed and turned into an action plan?

This was a fully comprehensive inspection covering all five areas, and the first visit on 6 February 2018 was unannounced. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 March 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 136 Manor Court Road

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at 136 Manor Court Road →

  2. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 April 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warwickshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near WarwickshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.