Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Penrose Court

Goodpublished 18 July 2025, 14 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2019

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind care, but staffing, care information and activities needed improvement.

This was the home’s first inspection since it registered. Inspectors visited unannounced on 30 September and 10 October 2019. They spoke with people living there, relatives and staff, observed care and checked care, medicine, staffing and management records.

People were generally protected from harm, supported with medicines and helped to access healthcare. Staff were described as kind, respectful and caring. The home was clean, and risks to people’s health and safety were usually assessed and managed.

Inspectors found that staff could not always access full care plans. Staffing was not always well organised, and people did not always receive enough support with hobbies, activities and going outside. The home was rated Requires Improvement overall, with Good ratings for Effective and Caring.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives spoke positively about staff. Inspectors observed friendly, respectful interactions and support that protected people’s privacy and dignity.

    “Throughout the inspection, we observed friendly and respectful interactions between people and staff.” from the report
  • Medicines managed safely

    Medicines were received, stored, given and disposed of safely. Staff handling medicines had training and their competence was checked.

    “Medicines were received, stored, administered and disposed of safely.” from the report
  • Risks and incidents were reviewed

    People’s risks were assessed and recorded. The home investigated incidents and shared learning with staff to reduce the chance of problems happening again.

    “There were detailed records to show that incidents had been investigated and that the registered manager had put systems in place to reduce the risk of recurrence.” from the report
  • Good access to health support

    People were supported to see GPs, community nurses and specialist doctors when needed. Staff worked with health professionals to support people’s health and nutrition.

    “People said staff supported them to access health services such as GPs, community nurses and specialist doctors.” from the report
  • People’s choices respected

    People were involved in decisions about daily life, including when they got up, went to bed and where they ate. Staff sought consent and supported people in the least restrictive way.

    “Staff told us they always asked people for their consent before they provided care and support.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staffing and deployment

    serious

    Staff were not always visible or deployed well across the home. This meant people might not receive support as quickly as they needed.

    “The registered manager needed to further review the staffing numbers and how staff were deployed in all areas of the service so that people received timely support.” from the report
  • Staff could not access full care plans

    serious

    Care staff could not routinely read the full care plans. The one-page summaries in bedrooms did not always give enough detail for specific needs.

    “Care staff did not have access to people's care plans because these were kept in a locked cupboard, and mainly accessed by senior staff when they reviewed and updated them.” from the report
  • Too few activities and outings

    needs fixing

    People said there was not enough stimulation or opportunity to pursue hobbies. Weekend activities were not always provided, and some people did not go outside as often as they wanted.

    “People told us there were not enough activities and opportunities for them to pursue their hobbies and interests.” from the report
  • Nursing care not yet provided

    needs fixing

    Although the home was registered to provide nursing care, it was not providing this at the inspection because it had not recruited enough nursing staff.

    “The service is registered to provide nursing care, but this was not being provided as the provider had not recruited enough nursing staff to support people with these care needs.” from the report
  • Communication and follow-up

    needs fixing

    One relative reported that requests were not always followed up. Inspectors said more work was needed to create a consistently person-centred culture.

    “There is a lack of communication, you mention something, they say yes, but it's never followed up.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has changed since the inspection to make sure care staff can access each person’s full, up-to-date care plan?
  2. 02How do you now decide how many staff are needed on each floor, and how do you check that staff are visible when people need help?
  3. 03What activities and support for hobbies are now available at weekends and for people who prefer to stay in their rooms?
  4. 04How often can people living on upper floors access the garden and fresh air, and is outdoor furniture now available?
  5. 05Are you now providing nursing care, and if not, what nursing staffing is still needed?

This was the first inspection of the newly registered home and covered all five CQC questions, including care, premises, staffing, records and management systems. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 November 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Penrose Court

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. November 2019Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Penrose Court →

  2. October 2018

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 October 2018.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Central Bedfordshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 83 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
Bridget S., about Nyarai N.
“She handled the new situation in front of her with such professionalism and I felt I could trust her 100%.”
Siobhan D., about Sithabile Tabile M.
See live-in carers near Central BedfordshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.