Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Parkview Nursing Home

Goodpublished 18 July 2025, 14 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with all five areas rated Good.

The inspection was unannounced. Inspectors visited on 28 June and 7 July 2023, spoke with people, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional, and checked care records, staff files, training and other records.

The home was rated Good overall and in Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People and relatives gave positive feedback about the care, staff kindness, safety, activities and communication.

Inspectors found that risks, medicines, infection control and staffing were managed safely. Care plans were personalised, people were involved in decisions, and staff worked with health and social care professionals.

The overall rating was unchanged from the previous Good rating published in February 2019. The Effective rating improved from Requires Improvement to Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    People and relatives described staff as caring and compassionate. Inspectors saw staff protecting privacy and dignity and encouraging independence.

    “People were well-supported and treated with dignity and respect.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's physical, emotional and mental health needs, life histories, preferences and risks. Staff knew people well and supported their choices.

    “Care plans were personalised and contained information relating to people's physical, emotional and mental health needs, their life histories and preferences.” from the report
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    Inspectors found good numbers of suitably recruited staff. Medicines were administered by trained nursing staff, with checks and audits in place.

    “We saw there were good numbers of suitably recruited staff on duty to support people safely according to their needs.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to maintain contact with relatives and friends. The activities coordinator provided a range of individual and culturally relevant activities.

    “The activities coordinator was creative in developing a wide range of individualised activities that people had expressed an interest in.” from the report
  • Effective management and improvement

    The home had regular checks of care, medicines, staffing, accidents, health and the environment. An improvement plan assigned actions and completion dates.

    “There was a comprehensive and effective governance system in place.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure my relative's digital care plan is kept up to date and shared with the family when appropriate?
  2. 02How do you check that staffing levels remain suitable for people's changing needs?
  3. 03How will you involve us in regular care plan reviews and decisions about our relative's care?
  4. 04How do you check for and follow up any gaps or mistakes in medicines records?
  5. 05Which activities would suit my relative's interests, culture, religion and abilities?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five key questions, including infection prevention and control; the visit took place on 28 June and 7 July 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2022

Parkview Nursing Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found infection control and visiting arrangements were in place.

Inspectors visited on 17 February 2022 with 24 hours’ notice. This was a targeted inspection during the COVID-19 pandemic. It looked at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and whether staffing pressures were affecting care.

Inspectors found that the home had systems for visitor screening, testing, vaccination checks, PPE, social distancing and isolation. Staff and residents were tested and vaccination records were kept. Inspectors also observed staff following PPE and social distancing guidance.

The service was described as safe, but it was not rated. This means the inspection did not provide a full rating of the home’s overall quality or of all five areas CQC normally considers.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor infection controls

    Visitors were screened on arrival, had their temperature checked and took a lateral flow test. The home also arranged dedicated rooms and garden visits.

    “The provider was following best practice guidance to prevent visitors to the home spreading COVID-19 infection.” from the report
  • Use of PPE and distancing

    The home had PPE stations and said staff used gloves, masks and aprons when providing personal care or when distancing was not possible. Inspectors saw staff following the guidance.

    “Our observations during the inspection confirmed staff were adhering to PPE and social distancing guidance.” from the report
  • Testing and vaccination records

    The provider said staff tested before each shift and that vaccination and testing registers were maintained for staff and residents.

    “The provider maintained a vaccination and testing register for staff and service users.” from the report
  • Managing infection risks

    People who tested positive were isolated and given a dedicated staff team. New admissions were tested and usually isolated.

    “All COVID-19 positive service users were isolated according to Public Health England Guidelines.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have your visiting arrangements changed since this inspection, and what checks are now used for visitors and visiting professionals?
  2. 02How do you currently manage a resident who tests positive for an infection, including isolation and dedicated staff support?
  3. 03How do you manage staffing pressures when staff are absent because of COVID-19 or other illness?
  4. 04Are staff and residents’ testing and vaccination records still kept and reviewed?
  5. 05What infection prevention and control training do staff receive now?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated overall. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 April 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Parkview Nursing Home

4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. August 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Parkview Nursing Home →

  2. April 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Parkview Nursing Home →

  3. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2016Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. September 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. September 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Croydon

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She cared for my mum with Alzheimer's with endless patience and kindness, always arriving with a smile and a positive attitude”
Marie-anne B., about Carla A.
“Terry has been of invaluable help to our family while working as a part-time live-in carer for our mother for approximately 6 months”
Bianca V., about Terry S.
See live-in carers near CroydonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.