CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Summit Road
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, May 2018
Outlook Care - Summit Road was rated Good; inspectors found caring, safe support but some staff training was overdue.
Inspectors visited without warning on 30 and 31 October 2017. They spoke with staff, reviewed care plans, risk assessments, medicines records, staff files and health and safety documents.
The home was rated Good in all five areas. People were protected from abuse and risks, medicines were managed well, and there were enough staff. Care was personalised, respectful and responsive to people's communication needs, health needs and preferences.
The main shortfall was that four staff members had not completed up-to-date epilepsy awareness training. The home's checks had not identified this. Inspectors also found that individual fire support plans were not up to date. They made a recommendation about staff training, but the report does not record a breach.
Detailed risk planning
Risk assessments were current and gave staff clear instructions about specific risks, including pressure ulcers and distressed behaviour.
“We saw a wide range of comprehensive and up to date risk assessments in people's care files such as those relating to nutrition, falls and moving and handling.” from the report
Good medicines support
Staff had relevant training, medicines records were accurate and guidance covered medicines given when needed.
“Medicines were well managed. Care staff had received relevant training to safely administer medicines and completed medicine administration records we reviewed accurately.” from the report
Personalised care
Care records included people's preferences, communication methods, changing needs and ways to promote independence.
“Details in care records about how people wished to be supported were personalised and provided clear information to enable staff to provide appropriate and effective support.” from the report
Kind and respectful staff
Staff built caring relationships and supported people's privacy, dignity and independence.
“Staff developed caring relationships with people using the service.” from the report
Overdue epilepsy training
needs fixingFour staff members did not have up-to-date epilepsy awareness training. Inspectors recommended that the provider seek guidance on keeping staff training current.
“The provider kept a training schedule which demonstrated that four staff member's epilepsy awareness training was not up to date.” from the report
Fire support plans
needs fixingIndividual plans explaining how to support people in a fire were not up to date.
“However, individual plans about how to support people in the case of fire were not up to date.” from the report
Checks missed the training issue
needs fixingThe home's quality monitoring and audit systems did not identify the overdue training.
“The areas of concern we found during the inspection about training were not highlighted and addressed by the provider's audit system and we have made recommendations about this.” from the report
- 01Have all staff who support residents with epilepsy now completed up-to-date epilepsy awareness training?
- 02Have individual fire support plans been updated for every person living in the home?
- 03How does the home's audit system now check that staff training remains up to date?
- 04How are people's communication methods and personal preferences kept current in their care plans?
- 05How are relatives involved in the regular reviews of care and support?
This inspection reviewed all five CQC areas and compared the home with its previous comprehensive inspection in September 2015. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 May 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Summit Road
2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- May 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- March 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- March 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 March 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Waltham Forest
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,200 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“Sidonia is a first class live-in carer whose dedication and thoughtfulness made her stay a happy experience.”
“Charity would take Nan on holidays day trips and shopping adventures”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.