Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Otterhayes

Goodpublished 10 August 2022, 4 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from avoidable harm. Risk assessments were comprehensive, staff understood safeguarding, and medicines and infection control were managed safely.
Effective?
Good
Care plans reflected people's needs, choices and aspirations. Staff had relevant training, supported balanced diets and worked with health professionals.
Caring?
Good
Staff provided kind and compassionate care. People were supported to communicate, make choices, maintain relationships and develop independence.
Responsive?
Good
Support was personalised and focused on people's goals, communication needs and interests. People were supported to take part in activities and build community links.
Well-led?
Good
Managers promoted a person-centred culture and used quality checks to improve the service. Staff and families were involved in discussions about care and service development.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2022

Rated Good overall; inspectors found kind, person-centred support, but some one-to-one staffing hours needed review.

This was the first inspection since the service registered in August 2021. One inspector visited on 30 June and 6 July 2022, spoke with people, staff, relatives and professionals, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and management records.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found that people were supported to make choices, stay safe, develop independence and take part in activities and community life.

Staff knew people well and provided kind care. Care plans were personalised, medicines and infection control were managed safely, and health professionals were involved when needed. The service was recruiting because of staffing difficulties, and some assessed one-to-one hours needed to be reviewed.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    Staff knew people well and recognised when they were worried or unhappy. Relatives also felt that risks were being managed for people's benefit.

    “People were kept safe from avoidable harm because staff knew them well and understood how to protect them from abuse.” from the report
  • Kind, respectful care

    Inspectors found warm and supportive relationships. Staff used communication styles people understood and respected their dignity, privacy and choices.

    “People received kind and compassionate care from staff who used positive, respectful language which people understood and responded well to.” from the report
  • Independence and community life

    People were supported to try new experiences, develop skills, find work and take part in activities and relationships that mattered to them.

    “People had the opportunity to try new experiences, develop new skills and gain independence.” from the report
  • Positive leadership

    Managers were visible and approachable. Staff felt supported, and inspectors found that the service's values were reflected in day-to-day support.

    “The management team worked hard to instil a culture of care in which staff truly valued and promoted people's individuality, protected their rights and enabled them to develop and flourish.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Delayed redecoration

    minor

    Redecoration at Hayes House had been delayed. A meeting took place to resolve the practical arrangements, with work scheduled to start in September 2022.

    “The redecoration of Hayes House had been delayed due to how this could be completed to ensure people's safety.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have you reviewed each person's assessed one-to-one hours since the inspection?
  2. 02How are you covering shifts while recruitment difficulties continue?
  3. 03Did the planned September 2022 redecoration of Hayes House take place, and what work was completed?
  4. 04Has the new manager registered with the CQC?
  5. 05How will you support my relative to take part in their chosen clubs, activities and community life?

This was an announced inspection covering all five CQC questions, the care home premises and personal care, and personal care and support in the supported living settings, but not the supported living premises. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 August 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Otterhayes

5 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. August 2022Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Otterhayes →

  2. February 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  3. September 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not ratedEffective: Inspected but not ratedResponsive: Inspected but not ratedWell-led: Inspected but not rated
  4. February 2020Inadequatedown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
  5. June 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  6. November 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  7. August 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 August 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

17 live-in carers within about an hour of Devon

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,270 a week. 15 can care for a couple. 13 years' experience on average.

“She is such a warm and gentle person while being professional and competent at the same time.”
Martin B., about Love B.
“She looked after my mum, who can be incredibly challenging, so well and so gently, and we always felt confident that my mum was getting the best care available.”
Holly C., about Dace L.
See live-in carers near DevonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.