Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at OSJCT Hartsholme House

Outstandingpublished 6 December 2024, 22 months ago

Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2018

Rated Outstanding; inspectors found kind, safe care with especially strong activities, family involvement and leadership.

Inspectors made an unannounced visit on 10 May 2018. They spoke with people living at the home, relatives and staff. They observed care and checked care records, staffing, medicines, training, safety checks and quality audits.

The home was rated Good for Safe, Effective and Caring. People were protected from abuse, supported by enough staff and given their medicines safely. Staff were trained and kind, and people received support with food, drink, health needs and independence.

The home was rated Outstanding for Responsive and Well-led, giving an overall Outstanding rating. Inspectors found highly personalised care, varied activities, strong family and community links, and a management team focused on listening and improving. Some mental capacity records were not fully completed, but the manager agreed to address this.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised care

    Staff had detailed knowledge of people's histories, needs and preferences. They used this to support choice, independence and meaningful activities.

    “Staff provided care in a truly patient centred way and staff had an excellent and in-depth knowledge of the people they cared for.” from the report
  • Activities and family life

    Activities were shaped around individual interests, and families were encouraged to take part in events and shared meals. The home also supported links with local groups and the wider community.

    “A wide range of social activities were provided for people and their families.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives described staff as kind, friendly and caring. Inspectors saw staff respond patiently and protect people's dignity during personal care.

    “People had excellent relationships with staff who were kind, caring and committed to ensuring they received the care they chose, with their likes and dislikes respected.” from the report
  • Strong leadership

    The management team was visible, listened to people and staff, and encouraged everyone to suggest improvements. Quality checks and learning from incidents were used to improve the service.

    “There was a strong commitment to continuous improvement of the quality of care and improving the experience of people using the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Incomplete mental capacity records

    needs fixing

    Records did not always show the assessments and decisions made about sensor mats, medicines and personal care when these caused distress. The manager said this would be reviewed and corrected.

    “mental capacity assessments and decision making in relation to decisions about the use of sensor mats, medicines administration, and the provision of personal care when this caused the person distress, were not always documented.” from the report
  • As-required medicines guidance

    minor

    Instructions for some medicines given only when needed were in place but did not contain as much detail as they could have.

    “however, these would have benefited from some additional detail.” from the report
  • Recording minor concerns

    minor

    The home dealt with minor concerns quickly, but the manager did not keep one central record of these concerns.

    “The manager did not keep a central record of low level concerns; however we saw evidence in people's records that they had been identified and dealt with.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now record mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions, especially for sensor mats, medicines and personal care?
  2. 02What extra information is now included in instructions for medicines given only when needed?
  3. 03How are minor concerns and 'niggles' recorded and reviewed?
  4. 04How will you involve our relative and family in care plan reviews and activities?
  5. 05How do you use falls, incidents and other quality checks to make changes to care?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five areas of Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led, including the accommodation and care provided. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 July 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of OSJCT Hartsholme House

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.

  1. July 2018Outstandingcurrent ratingup from Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at OSJCT Hartsholme House →

  2. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

9 live-in carers within about an hour of Lincolnshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

8 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Martin was more than a carer, he managed the home and became my uncle's best friend, enriching his life during his last few years.”
Julie V., about Martin G.
“Magda was always positive and proactive about trying new things to keep dad busy. She also introduced new ideas for keeping dad healthy.”
Scot H., about Magdalena B.
See live-in carers near LincolnshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.