Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Orchardown Rest Home

Goodpublished 6 May 2025, 17 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2017

Orchardown Rest Home was rated Good; inspectors found kind, safe care, with some records, communication and activity arrangements still needing attention.

This was an unannounced inspection on 21 and 27 June 2017. One inspector reviewed records, observed care, and spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and health professionals.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found improvements since May 2016. Earlier breaches about safety, welfare and record keeping had been addressed.

People were seen as safe and well cared for. Care plans and risk assessments had improved, medicines were generally managed safely, and staff were described as kind and patient. Inspectors still found some gaps in medicine records and said new systems needed time to become part of everyday practice.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and personal care

    Staff knew people well and treated them with patience and kindness. They supported personal choices and respected privacy.

    “Staff knew people well and actively engaged in conversation throughout the day and when they were supporting people with care needs.” from the report
  • Improved care planning

    New care plans included people's health needs, risks, preferences and life history. Reviews were being completed to keep information up to date.

    “New care plans had been implemented and information was now person centred and more detailed.” from the report
  • Health and nutrition support

    The home monitored people's weight and made referrals when concerns about nutrition, falls or health were identified. Meal choices and special dietary needs were recorded.

    “People were supported to maintain a balanced and nutritious diet.” from the report
  • Improvement since the last inspection

    The home had acted on the earlier findings about safety, welfare and records. The two regulations breached in 2016 were being met at this inspection.

    “We found that improvements had been made; the provider was now meeting the requirements of Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine records

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found four gaps in medicine administration records, so it was initially unclear whether some medicines had been given. Staff followed this up immediately, but accurate recording needed closer checking.

    “We found four signature gaps on the MAR chart where it was unclear if people had received their medicines or not.” from the report
  • Email communication

    needs fixing

    Some relatives who lived further away experienced delays when contacting the home by email. Inspectors recommended getting advice to improve how emails were managed.

    “relatives who lived a distance away and had previously contacted the home by email told us there could be quite a delay before they received a response.” from the report
  • New systems still bedding in

    minor

    Care records, audits and other quality checks had improved, but some were new or had not yet started. Inspectors said more time was needed for them to become routine.

    “some areas required time to become fully embedded into everyday practice.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are medicine administration records checked each day now, and have there been any further gaps?
  2. 02Who monitors and responds to emails from relatives, and what is the expected response time?
  3. 03What activities are currently offered for people who cannot go out without support?
  4. 04How are care plans and risk assessments reviewed when a person's needs change?
  5. 05What would happen if my relative's care needs increased beyond what the home can provide?

This was an unannounced inspection of the overall service, covering all five ratings, and it also checked improvements made after breaches found in May 2016. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 August 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Orchardown Rest Home

2 rated inspections over a year: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. August 2017Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Orchardown Rest Home →

  2. July 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 11 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

19 live-in carers within about an hour of East Sussex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,000 to £1,400 a week. 13 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“When he point blank refused to go into hospital for a life saving blood transfusion she talked him through the situation and agreed to go in the ambulance with him and stayed until he was settled.”
Clare S., about Mihaela B.
“Una felt safe, secure and loved in her time with Debbie which is a gift that I am eternally grateful for.”
Tisana S., about Debra S.
See live-in carers near East SussexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.